• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Immunol . The role of cell-mediated immunity against influenza and its implications for vaccine evaluation

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Immunol


. 2022 Aug 16;13:959379.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.959379. eCollection 2022.
The role of cell-mediated immunity against influenza and its implications for vaccine evaluation


Yorick Janssens[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jasper Joye[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Gwenn Waerlop[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Frédéric Clement[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Geert Leroux-Roels[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Isabel Leroux-Roels[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Influenza vaccines remain the most effective tools to prevent flu and its complications. Trivalent or quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines primarily elicit antibodies towards haemagglutinin and neuraminidase. These vaccines fail to induce high protective efficacy, in particular in older adults and immunocompromised individuals and require annual updates to keep up with evolving influenza strains (antigenic drift). Vaccine efficacy declines when there is a mismatch between its content and circulating strains. Current correlates of protection are merely based on serological parameters determined by haemagglutination inhibition or single radial haemolysis assays. However, there is ample evidence showing that these serological correlates of protection can both over- or underestimate the protective efficacy of influenza vaccines. Next-generation universal influenza vaccines that induce cross-reactive cellular immune responses (CD4[SUP]+[/SUP] and/or CD8[SUP]+[/SUP] T-cell responses) against conserved epitopes may overcome some of the shortcomings of the current inactivated vaccines by eliciting broader protection that lasts for several influenza seasons and potentially enhances pandemic preparedness. Assessment of cellular immune responses in clinical trials that evaluate the immunogenicity of these new generation vaccines is thus of utmost importance. Moreover, studies are needed to examine whether these cross-reactive cellular immune responses can be considered as new or complementary correlates of protection in the evaluation of traditional and next-generation influenza vaccines. An overview of the assays that can be applied to measure cell-mediated immune responses to influenza with their strengths and weaknesses is provided here.

Keywords: CD4; CD8; T-cell; cellular immunity; clinical trial; correlate of protection; influenza; vaccine.
 
Back
Top Bottom