• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Immunol . Reduced T Cell and Antibody Responses to Inactivated Coronavirus Vaccine Among Individuals Above 55 Years Old

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Immunol


. 2022 Mar 1;13:812126.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.812126. eCollection 2022.
Reduced T Cell and Antibody Responses to Inactivated Coronavirus Vaccine Among Individuals Above 55 Years Old


Giuliana X Medeiros[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Greyce Luri Sasahara[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jhosiene Y Magawa[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], João Paulo S Nunes[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Fernanda R Bruno[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Andreia C Kuramoto[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Rafael R Almeida[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Marcelo A Ferreira[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Guilherme P Scagion[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Érika D Candido[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Fabyano B Leal[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Danielle B L Oliveira[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Edison L Durigon[SUP] 4 6 [/SUP], Roberto Carlos V Silva Jr[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Daniela S Rosa[SUP] 7 8 [/SUP], Silvia B Boscardin[SUP] 9 8 [/SUP], Verônica Coelho[SUP] 1 2 8 [/SUP], Jorge Kalil[SUP] 1 2 8 [/SUP], Keity S Santos[SUP] 1 2 8 [/SUP], Edecio Cunha-Neto[SUP] 1 2 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

CoronaVac is an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine that has been rolled out in several low and middle-income countries including Brazil, where it was the mainstay of the first wave of immunization of healthcare workers and the elderly population. We aimed to assess the T cell and antibody responses of vaccinated individuals as compared to convalescent patients. We detected IgG against SARS-CoV-2 antigens, neutralizing antibodies against the reference Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 strain and used SARS-CoV-2 peptides to detect IFN-g and IL-2 specific T cell responses in a group of CoronaVac vaccinated individuals (N = 101) and convalescent (N = 72) individuals. The frequency among vaccinated individuals, of whom 96% displayed T cell and/or antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2, is comparable to 98.5% responses of convalescent individuals. We observed that among vaccinated individuals, men and individuals 55 years or older developed significantly lower anti-RBD, anti-NP and neutralization titers against the Wuhan strain and antigen-induced IL-2 production by T cells. Neutralizing antibody responses for Gamma variant were even lower than for the Wuhan strain. Even though some studies indicated CoronaVac helped reduce mortality among elderly people, considering the appearance of novel variants of concern, CoronaVac vaccinated individuals above 55 years old are likely to benefit from a heterologous third dose/booster vaccine to increase immune response and likely protection.

Keywords: COVID-19; CoronaVac; T cell responses; age; antibody; neutralizing antibody; vaccine.
 
Back
Top Bottom