• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Immunol . A head-to-head comparison of humoral and cellular immune responses of five COVID-19 vaccines in adults in China

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Immunol


. 2024 Aug 21:15:1455730.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1455730. eCollection 2024. A head-to-head comparison of humoral and cellular immune responses of five COVID-19 vaccines in adults in China

Xu Han[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hongxing Pan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pengfei Jin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mingwei Wei[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Siyue Jia[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Wenjuan Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kai Chu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shuyu Gao[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Li Zhou[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jingxin Li[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Fengcai Zhu[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Introduction: Various COVID-19 vaccine trials have shown that vaccines can successfully prevent symptomatic cases of COVID-19 and death. Head-to-head comparisons help to better understand the immune response characteristics of different COVID-19 vaccines in humans.
Methods: We randomly selected 20 participants from each of five ongoing Phase II trials of COVID-19 vaccines. Here, SARS-CoV 2-specific immune responses to DNA vaccine (INO-4800), mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2), Adenovirus-vectored vaccine (CONVIDECIA), Protein subunit vaccine (Recombinant COVID- 19 Vaccine (Sf9 Cells)), Inactivated Vaccine (KCONVAC) were examined longitudinally in healthy adults between Jan 15, 2021 and July 5, 2021 for 6 months. RBD-IgG titres were detected by ELISA, neutralising antibody titer were detected by pseudoviral neutralization and immune cell response were detected by flow cytometry.
Results: At the first visit (V1), 100% of individuals who received the BNT162b2, CONVIDECIA, or KCONVAC vaccines experienced seroconversion of neutralizing and binding antibodies in the serum. Except for the Recombinant COVID-19 Vaccine (Sf9 Cells) vaccine having the highest neutralizing antibody GMT at the second visit (although there was no statistically significant difference in geometric mean titers between V1 and V2), the rest of the vaccines had the highest levels of binding antibodies and neutralizing antibodies at V1. The neutralizing antibodies GMT of all vaccines showed a significant decrease at V3 compared to V1. The neutralizing antibody GMT against the omicron variant of all vaccines at V1 showed a significant decrease compared to the wild strain. We observed statistically significant differences in Tcm cells and RBD-specific memory B cells among various vaccines.
Discussion: BNT162b2 (mRNA vaccine) exhibits the highest antibody levels among the five vaccines evaluated, regardless of whether the target is the wild-type virus or its variants. However, its cellular immune response may be weaker compared to CONVIDECIA (adenovirus type 5 vector vaccine).

Keywords: COVID-19 vaccines; SARS-COV-2 variant; cellular immune; head-to-head; humoral immune.

 
Back
Top Bottom