• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Forward Hysteresis and Backward Bifurcation Caused by Culling in an Avian Influenza Model

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Math Biosci. 2013 Sep 19. pii: S0025-5564(13)00229-0. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2013.09.001. [Epub ahead of print]
Forward Hysteresis and Backward Bifurcation Caused by Culling in an Avian Influenza Model.
Gulbudak H, Martcheva M.
Source

Department of Mathematics, University of Florida, 358 Little Hall, PO Box 118105, Gainesville, FL 32611-8105. Electronic address: hgulbudak@ufl.edu.
Abstract

The emerging threat of a human pandemic caused by the H5N1 avian influenza virus strain magnifies the need for controlling the incidence of H5N1 infection in domestic bird populations. Culling is one of the most widely used control measures and has proved effective for isolated outbreaks. However, the socio-economic impacts of mass culling, in the face of a disease which has become endemic in many regions of the world, can affect the implementation and success of culling as a control measure. We use mathematical modeling to understand the dynamics of avian influenza und er different culling approaches. We incorporate culling into an SI model by considering the per capita culling rates to be general functions of the number of infected birds. Complex dynamics of the system, such as backward bifurcation and forward hysteresis, along with bi-stability, are detected and analyzed for two distinct culling scenarios. In these cases, employing other control measures temporarily can drastically change the dynamics of the solutions to a more favorable outcome for disease control.

Copyright ? 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.
KEYWORDS:

92D30, 92D40, Avian influenza, Backward bifurcation, Culling, Differential equations, H5N1, Hysteresis, Mathematical models, Reproduction number, Temporary control measures, bistability

PMID:
24056242
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24056242
 
Back
Top Bottom