• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Food Safety Incident, Public Health Concern, and Risk Spillover Heterogeneity: Avian Influenza Shocks as Natural Experiments in China's Consumer Marke

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 29;16(21). pii: E4182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214182. [h=1]Food Safety Incident, Public Health Concern, and Risk Spillover Heterogeneity: Avian Influenza Shocks as Natural Experiments in China's Consumer Markets.[/h]
Yi L[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Tao J[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Zhu Z[SUP]5[/SUP], Tan C[SUP]6[/SUP], Qi L[SUP]7[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h] 1 College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China. yilan@webmail.hzau.edu.cn. 2 Hubei Rural Development Research Center, Wuhan 430070, China. yilan@webmail.hzau.edu.cn. 3 College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China. jptao@mail.hzau.edu.cn. 4 Hubei Rural Development Research Center, Wuhan 430070, China. jptao@mail.hzau.edu.cn. 5 College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China. zzk@mail.hzau.edu.cn. 6 College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China. tancaicai@webmail.hzau.edu.cn. 7 College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China. qile@webmail.hzau.edu.cn.

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Background: Food safety incidents have aroused widespread public health concern, causing food price risk. However, the causal paths remain largely unexplored in previous literature. This paper sets out to identify the relations of local and spatial spillovers of food safety incidents and public health concerns to food price risk in consumer markets within a setting with heterogeneous food safety risk levels. Methods: (i) Theoretically, unlike prior work, this paper decomposes food safety risks into food safety incidents (objective incident component) and public health concern (subjective concern component). This article develops a theoretical framework of causality to capture the underlying causal pathways motivated by the theories of limited attention and two-step flow of communication. (ii) Empirically, using avian influenza shocks in China's poultry markets as natural experiments, this paper differentiates between low- and high-risk food and incidents. The article adopts dynamic spatial panel models to analyze potential nonlinearity, moderation, and mediation in the spillover of food safety risk to food price risk for a long panel of 30 provinces covering the November 2007 to November 2017 period. Results: (i) Food safety incident alone only triggers high-risk food price risk, not low-risk food price risk. (ii) Public health concern amplifies nonlinear food price risk triggered by food safety incident. (iii) High-risk incident intensifies negative pressure of public health concern on food price risk. (iv) Food safety incident indirectly affects high-risk food price risk through public health concern. Conclusions: Using a setting with heterogeneous risk levels, this paper documents that (i) food safety incident itself does not necessarily determine food price risk, whereas it is actually public health concern that directly causes nonlinear food price risk; (ii) public health concern spillover to food price risk is negatively moderated by high-risk incident, and (iii) food safety incident spillover to high-risk food price risk is mediated by public health concern. The findings complement current research by (i) elucidating the diverse impacts of food safety incident and public health concern on food price risk, which are obscure in previous literature, and (ii) highlighting that heterogeneous food and incident risk levels matter for determining food price risk spillover.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] price risk mechanism; price risk mediation; price risk moderation; price risk nonlinearity; public health economics

PMID: 31671853 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16214182
 
Back
Top Bottom