• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

FluTrackers Confirmed U.S. Deaths - June 5 - June 26, 2009

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Flutrackers Confirmed U.S. Fatalities 6/26/09 .....

Arizona - 8
California - 17
Connecticut - 5
Florida - 2
Illinois - 13
Maryland - 1
Massachusetts - 1
Michigan - 7
Minnesota - 1
Missouri - 1
Nevada - 1
New Jersey - 6
New York - 40
North Carolina - 1
Oklahoma - 1
Oregon - 3
Pennsylvania - 4
Rhode Island - 1
Texas - 15
Utah - 10
Virginia - 1
Washington - 3
Wisconsin - 4

TOTAL - 146

#137 Texas - Bexar County, unidentified man died in June reported 6/24/09
#138 California - Contra Costa, unidentified person, reported 6/25/09
#139 California - Los Angeles, unidentified person, reported 6/25/09 Is this Cristian Torres Rodriguez ??[/B]
#140 California - Orange County, unidentified person, reported 6/25/09
#141 California - Orange County, unidentified person, reported 6/25/09
#142 California - Sonoma County, unidentified person, reported 6/25/09 Is this Sonoma County, elderly man died 6/19/09 reported 6/19/09??
#143 California - Solano County, 53 year old man reported 6/25/09 *healthy, California's 17th death
#144 Oregon - no location, unidentified person, 3rd death in the state reported 6/26/09 by CDC
#145 Illinois - Chicago, 54 year old woman died 6/10/09 reported 6/26/09 *unspecified medical problems, hospitalized 6/2
#146 Illinois - Chicago, 47 year old woman died 6/23/09 reported 6/26/09 *healthy, hospitalized 6/20


U.S. Deaths Abroad:

#1 Canada, Ontario - a U.S. resident, 78 year old man, died in Orangeville while visiting, reported 6/17/09
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

wotan.... I just tried to post that list as a "quick reply" to the original post (#1), and it still ended up in the main thread. did I do it wrong?
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

oh I get it... you change the display mode (top right corner) to "threaded mode" and then you can see a separate sub thread where I posted that list. sorry!
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

appleblossom said:
oh I get it... you change the display mode (top right corner) to "threaded mode" and then you can see a separate sub thread where I posted that list. sorry!
Click to expand...

Yes, exactly! If you expand the threads deeply enough then you will find the forum no longer fits within a 17inch monitor and a lot of side to side scrolling is necessary to read things. This is much easier to track!
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

wotan said:
Yes, exactly! If you expand the threads deeply enough then you will find the forum no longer fits within a 17inch monitor and a lot of side to side scrolling is necessary to read things. This is much easier to track!
Click to expand...

ummm......for the clueless among us (like me)..... how will I find the running updated list???
thanks.
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

appleblossom said:
Flutrackers Confirmed U.S. Fatalities 6/26/09 .....

#144 Oregon - no location, unidentified person, 3rd death in the state reported 6/26/09 by CDC
Click to expand...

fyi......oregon state site says it will update count by 12noon today (PST, of course, I presume). Funny, they only show one death thus far, with one press release.
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Are you viewing linear, threaded, or hybrid? If you are using linear there probably won't be a change, the new post should just be at the bottom of the list. If you are on threaded or hybrid it should be a big change. When using one of the threaded views (I use hybrid) the new posts were getting buried very deeply. However, if appleblossom posts her new lists as a reply to the original post, those using a threaded view will see them all on the far left side of the message list, and new threads from those posts can develop. I guess not as many people use the threaded views. :) So maybe not as many people were having the difficulties I have been experiencing. :D
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

wotan said:
Are you viewing linear, threaded, or hybrid? If you are using linear there probably won't be a change, the new post should just be at the bottom of the list. If you are on threaded or hybrid it should be a big change. When using one of the threaded views (I use hybrid) the new posts were getting buried very deeply. However, if appleblossom posts her new lists as a reply to the original post, those using a threaded view will see them all on the far left side of the message list, and new threads from those posts can develop. I guess not as many people use the threaded views. :) So maybe not as many people were having the difficulties I have been experiencing. :D
Click to expand...

lol....wotan, I guess you didn't fully appreciate what I meant when I said 'clueless'. I have no idea what you are asking, so I'm gonna assume (at whatever risk) that I am using linear.
Anyway, whenever the very next list comes out, could someone just say that a new list is out, so I can see if I'm seeing it or not (yeah, you know what I mean). thanks!
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

appleblossom said:
What about Illinois? They're reporting death #11 and 12 today, but adding those 2 onto our Illinois list makes 13. None of them are repeats as far as I can tell.

http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=255757#post255757
Click to expand...

a stab-in-the-dark guess:
The total is really 12.
The IL DOH data was released this AM. 1 of the 2 reported deaths in the Suntimes article died 3 days ago, so possibly (maybe) her paperwork didn't have time to cross someone's desk to be included in the DOH total for today.
So.......if we delete the unidentified, uncharacterized death from earlier today, and just keep these 2 women, we would have 12.
reasonable or bogus?
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Above the box that has the message list, on the right side, should be a little pull down menu called Display Modes. Click on that, one of them will be in black text. That is your display mode. Since my message here that you responded to was responding to a response to a list, look back about 7 posts (assuming you are linear mode) and you should see appleblossom's most recent list.
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

wotan said:
Above the box that has the message list, on the right side, should be a little pull down menu called Display Modes. Click on that, one of them will be in black text. That is your display mode. Since my message here that you responded to was responding to a response to a list, look back about 7 posts (assuming you are linear mode) and you should see appleblossom's most recent list.
Click to expand...

ahhh....I see. thank you, kind sir.
I think I like this better......less organized, but way more fun.
thanks for your help!
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

So if you are staying with linear I don't think you will notice a difference.
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Do we know how many are on ventilators right now?
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Jeremy said:
Do we know how many are on ventilators right now?
Click to expand...
That would be nearly impossible to determine due to privacy issues and the fact that hospitals don't have to report the condition of patients to the CDC, so the state health depts. probably don't even know.

I've been tracking total (not current) hospitalization numbers for each state and even though the states report that number to CDC weekly, only about half provide the information on their websites. For the rest, it's going to require a lot of phone calls. So, details beyond what is reported to CDC might not even be collected beyond the County level, at best.
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

cutter said:
a stab-in-the-dark guess:
The total is really 12.
The IL DOH data was released this AM. 1 of the 2 reported deaths in the Suntimes article died 3 days ago, so possibly (maybe) her paperwork didn't have time to cross someone's desk to be included in the DOH total for today.
So.......if we delete the unidentified, uncharacterized death from earlier today, and just keep these 2 women, we would have 12.
reasonable or bogus?
Click to expand...


This is what my tentative Illinois list looks like right now :

Illinois: 13
#1 Cook County, Chicago 22 year old male, died 5/24/09 reported 5/25/09 *unspecified underlying condition
#2 Cook County, Chicago adult female, reported 5/27/09 *unspecified significant medical conditions
#3 Kane County 42 year old male, reported 5/28/09 *unspecified chronic conditions
#4 Chicago 20 year old woman, Caitlin Huber died 5/30/09 reported 6/2/09 *pregnant
#5 Lake County, Gurnee 74 year old male, died 6/2/09 reported 6/4/09 *unspecified significant medical conditions
#6 Chicago, 26 year old woman Edriana Ramirez, died 6/9/09 reported 6/17/09 *healthy, hospitalized 1 week
#7 Chicago, 52 year old man died 6/11/09 reported 6/17/09 *had other unspecified health problems, hospitalized 5/30/09
#8 Cook County, 8 year old suburban Chicago boy Mark Dampier Jr., resident of Oak Forest, died 6/13/09 reported 6/17/09 *no known health problems, became ill 6/11/09
#9 Cook County, Western Springs 29 year old woman reported 6/18/09 *other health problems
#10 Cook County, Mount Prospect 29 year old man reported 6/18/09 *other health problems
#11 La Salle County, 18 year old woman reported 6/19/09 *unspecified underlying conditions
#12 Chicago, 54 year old woman died 6/10/09 reported 6/26/09 *unspecified medical problems, hospitalized 6/2
#13 Chicago, 47 year old woman died 6/23/09 reported 6/26/09 *healthy, hospitalized 6/20


so I don't have an unidentified death to delete, except possibly #2 Cook County which is an older one. So as I said, I am getting 13 deaths and no repeats. Where did I go wrong? :confused:
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Hello guys. Work has kept me hopping today, but I have been following along.

I have 145 as of right now, but I am showing 12 for Illinois, not 13. From the discussion above that sounds like the most reliable number for Illinois, or did I miss something? (I am showing the total world count as 329, but I have not been able to follow it very closely.)
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

appleblossom said:
This is what my tentative Illinois list looks like right now :

Illinois: 13
#1 Cook County, Chicago 22 year old male, died 5/24/09 reported 5/25/09 *unspecified underlying condition
#2 Cook County, Chicago adult female, reported 5/27/09 *unspecified significant medical conditions
#3 Kane County 42 year old male, reported 5/28/09 *unspecified chronic conditions
#4 Chicago 20 year old woman, Caitlin Huber died 5/30/09 reported 6/2/09 *pregnant
#5 Lake County, Gurnee 74 year old male, died 6/2/09 reported 6/4/09 *unspecified significant medical conditions
#6 Chicago, 26 year old woman Edriana Ramirez, died 6/9/09 reported 6/17/09 *healthy, hospitalized 1 week
#7 Chicago, 52 year old man died 6/11/09 reported 6/17/09 *had other unspecified health problems, hospitalized 5/30/09
#8 Cook County, 8 year old suburban Chicago boy Mark Dampier Jr., resident of Oak Forest, died 6/13/09 reported 6/17/09 *no known health problems, became ill 6/11/09
#9 Cook County, Western Springs 29 year old woman reported 6/18/09 *other health problems
#10 Cook County, Mount Prospect 29 year old man reported 6/18/09 *other health problems
#11 La Salle County, 18 year old woman reported 6/19/09 *unspecified underlying conditions
#12 Chicago, 54 year old woman died 6/10/09 reported 6/26/09 *unspecified medical problems, hospitalized 6/2
#13 Chicago, 47 year old woman died 6/23/09 reported 6/26/09 *healthy, hospitalized 6/20


so I don't have an unidentified death to delete, except possibly #2 Cook County which is an older one. So as I said, I am getting 13 deaths and no repeats. Where did I go wrong? :confused:
Click to expand...

We cross posted.

I am looking over your list and it all looks correct. Maybe I need to revise my count.

Thanks again for all the work you are putting into keeping this list current.
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

you guys do all the work, I'm just the secretary

anyone want coffee? ;)
 
Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

Re: Links - Updated U.S. Death Counts

cutter said:
Okay, she answered.
"I spoke to the Oakland Co. Health Division last week for my story about the five deaths and they confirmed one was from Oakland County. I spoke to the same manager yesterday and asked about the second confirmed Oakland County death."
Click to expand...

sorry, I misread this the first time. So that is the final answer from the reporter on the Michigan deaths, that the article is correct. So then it's up to us to decide between them, do we go with Michigan DOH website or the article for our locations?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top