• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Flu vaccine delivered into lungs gives better results [Alertnet]

Giuseppe

Emeritus
Flu vaccine delivered into lungs gives better results [Alertnet]

Flu vaccine delivered into lungs gives better results

25 Sep 2008 06:49:42 GMT

Source: Reuters

HONG KONG, Sept 25 (Reuters) -

Delivering flu vaccines straight into the lungs instead of through routine injections could trigger a far stronger immune response, a study has found.


The world is expected to be extremely short of vaccines in the event of a flu pandemic, so the search for the best way to deliver vaccines is important because it would economise on the quantity of each dose.

The Australian study, published in Mucosal Immunology, showed that lower doses of a seasonal flu vaccine delivered into the lungs of sheep gave better protection against flu than a higher standard dose that was injected into another group of sheep.

"Our results suggest that delivery by the lung may allow a much lower ... dose to be used in the influenza vaccine, while inducing equivalent or perhaps even improved protection. This would mean more people would quickly be able to receive the vaccine," associate professor Philip Sutton of the Centre for Animal Biotechnology at the University of Melbourne wrote in an email to Reuters.

The scientists delivered three different doses of flu vaccines (15, 5 and 1 micrograms) into the lungs of three groups of sheep using a bronchoscope, or tube. A fourth group of sheep was injected with standard 15-microgram flu vaccines.

"Lung delivery produced superior levels of antibodies in the lung (approximately 1,000 times more), where the influenza virus infects, than the injected vaccine. The antibodies produced in the blood and lung were able to block the ability of the virus to stick to the receptor it uses to infect cells, demonstrating they would be effective against infection," Sutton said.

The generation of such huge amounts of antibodies in the lungs was especially important in the case of influenza, because flu is spread from person to person mainly through sneezing and coughing.

"The generation of functional antibodies in the lung could potentially help reduce the spread of the infection by neutralising the virus before it can be breathed out by an infected person," Sutton said.

He noted, however, that they would need to find better ways to deliver vaccine directly into the lungs.

(Reporting by Tan Ee Lyn; Editing by David Fogarty)
--
<cite cite="http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/T162307.htm">Reuters AlertNet - Flu vaccine delivered into lungs gives better results</cite>
 
Re: Flu vaccine delivered into lungs gives better results [Alertnet]

first time that I hear that sheep can get flu.
No sheep-flu sequence at genbank

> using a bronchoscope, or tube

is it practicable in humans ?

> Lung delivery produced superior levels of antibodies in the lung (approximately 1,000 times more),
> where the influenza virus infects, than the injected vaccine.

1000 times more !

> He noted, however, that they would need to find better ways to deliver vaccine directly into the lungs.

maybe inhalating powdered vaccine with the Relenza-diskhaler


is this cell mediated T-cell immunity ?
or humoral, B-cell immunity ?
 
Re: Flu vaccine delivered into lungs gives better results [Alertnet]

inhalating vaccine exist : It stimulates IG A ( better immune response ).

Immunity is a whole: there is always B and T answer at an antigenic aggression .
some T stimulate or inhibit B ( and the level of B inhibit or stimulate some T.. ) : there is a lot of interactions.
 
Re: Flu vaccine delivered into lungs gives better results [Alertnet]

#2:
"... first time that I hear that sheep can get flu."

After reading whales got it ..., it seems omnipresent.

Those sheeps was probably that ones picked as "guinea pigs" for the lab experiments ...
 
Back
Top