• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

FCC?s Cell Phone Radiation Standards Need Review, GAO Report Says

Emily

Editor, Senior Moderator
http://www.chron.com/business/press-releases/article/FCC-s-Cell-Phone-Radiation-Standards-Need-3773748.php
FCC?s Cell Phone Radiation Standards Need Review, GAO Report Says
PRWeb
Published 1:40 a.m., Thursday, August 9, 2012

New York, NY (PRWEB) August 08, 2012

Cell phone radiation standards need to be updated, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (?GAO?) announced in a report released August 7, 2012. Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing clients injured by cell phone radiation, reports that the year-long review found the Federal Communications Commission (?FCC?) standards outdated compared to international standards. The FCC?s radiofrequency (?RF?) energy limit was set in 1996 and has not been updated since. The GAO report states that the outdated limit may fail to reflect recent research on cell phone radiation, and testing requirements may not reflect maximum exposure in all conditions. For example, the FCC also does not account for devices carried against the body, such as in pockets. ?With mobile phones in the pockets and purses of millions of Americans, we need a full understanding of the long-term impact of mobile phone use on the human body,? Representative Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat who called for the GAO report, commented.**

Cell Phone Radiation Concerns Include Cancer and Brain Tumors...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom