tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Fam Pract
. 2021 Oct 6;cmab122.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab122. Online ahead of print.
Clinical prediction of laboratory-confirmed influenza in adults with influenza-like illness in primary care. A randomized controlled trial secondary analysis in 15 European countries
Dan Ouchi[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ana García-Sangenís[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ana Moragas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alike W van der Velden[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Theo J Verheij[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Christopher C Butler[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Emily Bongard[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Samuel Coenen[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Johanna Cook[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Nick A Francis[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Maciek Godycki-Cwirko[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Pia Touboul Lundgren[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Christos Lionis[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Ruta Radzeviciene Jurgute[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Sławomir Chlabicz[SUP] 11 [/SUP], An De Sutter[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Heiner C Bucher[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Bohumil Seifert[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Bernadett Kovács[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Muireann de Paor[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Pär-Daniel Sundvall[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Rune Aabenhus[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Nicolay Jonassen Harbin[SUP] 19 [/SUP], Greet Ieven[SUP] 20 [/SUP], Herman Goossens[SUP] 20 [/SUP], Morten Lindbæk[SUP] 19 [/SUP], Lars Bjerrum[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Carl Llor[SUP] 1 21 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Clinical findings do not accurately predict laboratory diagnosis of influenza. Early identification of influenza is considered useful for proper management decisions in primary care.
Objective: We evaluated the diagnostic value of the presence and the severity of symptoms for the diagnosis of laboratory-confirmed influenza infection among adults presenting with influenza-like illness (ILI) in primary care.
Methods: Secondary analysis of patients with ILI who participated in a clinical trial from 2015 to 2018 in 15 European countries. Patients rated signs and symptoms as absent, minor, moderate, or major problem. A nasopharyngeal swab was taken for microbiological identification of influenza and other microorganisms. Models were generated considering (i) the presence of individual symptoms and (ii) the severity rating of symptoms.
Results: A total of 2,639 patients aged 18 or older were included in the analysis. The mean age was 41.8 ± 14.7 years, and 1,099 were men (42.1%). Influenza was microbiologically confirmed in 1,337 patients (51.1%). The area under the curve (AUC) of the model for the presence of any of seven symptoms for detecting influenza was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.68), whereas the AUC of the symptom severity model, which included eight variables-cough, fever, muscle aches, sweating and/or chills, moderate to severe overall disease, age, abdominal pain, and sore throat-was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.69-0.72).
Conclusion: Clinical prediction of microbiologically confirmed influenza in adults with ILI is slightly more accurate when based on patient reported symptom severity than when based on the presence or absence of symptoms.
Keywords: clinical decision rules; diagnosis; human; influenza; primary health care; symptom assessment.
. 2021 Oct 6;cmab122.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab122. Online ahead of print.
Clinical prediction of laboratory-confirmed influenza in adults with influenza-like illness in primary care. A randomized controlled trial secondary analysis in 15 European countries
Dan Ouchi[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ana García-Sangenís[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ana Moragas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alike W van der Velden[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Theo J Verheij[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Christopher C Butler[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Emily Bongard[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Samuel Coenen[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Johanna Cook[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Nick A Francis[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Maciek Godycki-Cwirko[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Pia Touboul Lundgren[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Christos Lionis[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Ruta Radzeviciene Jurgute[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Sławomir Chlabicz[SUP] 11 [/SUP], An De Sutter[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Heiner C Bucher[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Bohumil Seifert[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Bernadett Kovács[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Muireann de Paor[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Pär-Daniel Sundvall[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Rune Aabenhus[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Nicolay Jonassen Harbin[SUP] 19 [/SUP], Greet Ieven[SUP] 20 [/SUP], Herman Goossens[SUP] 20 [/SUP], Morten Lindbæk[SUP] 19 [/SUP], Lars Bjerrum[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Carl Llor[SUP] 1 21 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34611715
- DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmab122
Abstract
Background: Clinical findings do not accurately predict laboratory diagnosis of influenza. Early identification of influenza is considered useful for proper management decisions in primary care.
Objective: We evaluated the diagnostic value of the presence and the severity of symptoms for the diagnosis of laboratory-confirmed influenza infection among adults presenting with influenza-like illness (ILI) in primary care.
Methods: Secondary analysis of patients with ILI who participated in a clinical trial from 2015 to 2018 in 15 European countries. Patients rated signs and symptoms as absent, minor, moderate, or major problem. A nasopharyngeal swab was taken for microbiological identification of influenza and other microorganisms. Models were generated considering (i) the presence of individual symptoms and (ii) the severity rating of symptoms.
Results: A total of 2,639 patients aged 18 or older were included in the analysis. The mean age was 41.8 ± 14.7 years, and 1,099 were men (42.1%). Influenza was microbiologically confirmed in 1,337 patients (51.1%). The area under the curve (AUC) of the model for the presence of any of seven symptoms for detecting influenza was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.68), whereas the AUC of the symptom severity model, which included eight variables-cough, fever, muscle aches, sweating and/or chills, moderate to severe overall disease, age, abdominal pain, and sore throat-was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.69-0.72).
Conclusion: Clinical prediction of microbiologically confirmed influenza in adults with ILI is slightly more accurate when based on patient reported symptom severity than when based on the presence or absence of symptoms.
Keywords: clinical decision rules; diagnosis; human; influenza; primary health care; symptom assessment.