• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Factors associated with seasonal influenza self-diagnosis: a prospective observational study in Japan

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2020 Mar 23;30(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-0165-3.
Factors associated with seasonal influenza self-diagnosis: a prospective observational study in Japan.


Maita H[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Kobayashi T[SUP]3[/SUP], Akimoto T[SUP]3[/SUP], Matsuoka F[SUP]4[/SUP], Osawa H[SUP]3[/SUP], Kato H[SUP]5,[/SUP][SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

This prospective observational study, conducted at a community clinic in Japan during the influenza season, from December 2017 to April 2018 aimed to investigate the accuracy of factors used for influenza self-diagnosis. Data were collected from pre-examination checklists issued to patients with suspected influenza and electronic medical records. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed using a rapid influenza diagnostic test as the reference standard, and 2 ? 2 contingency tables were analysed at each cut-off point. We analysed data from 290 patients (72.8% males, median age: 38 years, interquartile range: 26-50 years). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for patients who were aware of other patients presumed to have influenza within close proximity was 0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.82). The AUCs for patients with a history of influenza, unvaccinated status, cough, or nasal discharge were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.60-0.75), 0.66 (95% CI: 0.59-0.73), 0.67 (95% CI: 0.59-0.75), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62-0.78), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratio at a 90% cut-off point was 19.5% (95% CI: 13.5-26.6%), 94.1% (95% CI: 88.7-97.4%) and 3.31 (95% CI: 1.57-6.98). The sensitivity, specificity and negative likelihood ratio at a 10% cut-off point was 95.5% (95% CI: 90.9-98.2%), 9.6% (95% CI: 5.2-15.8%) and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.20-1.16). After multivariate logistic regression analysis, the AUC increased significantly from 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.83) to 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) when self-diagnosis-related information was added to basic clinical information. We identified factors that improve the accuracy and validity of influenza self-diagnosis. Appropriate self-diagnosis could contribute to the containment efforts during influenza epidemics and reduce its social and economic burden.



PMID:32251292DOI:10.1038/s41533-020-0165-3
 
Back
Top Bottom