• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Factors affecting uptake of influenza vaccination among family physicians

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2016 Feb 17. pii: S0264-410X(16)00120-1. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.057. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Factors affecting uptake of influenza vaccination among family physicians.[/h] Akan H[SUP]1[/SUP], Yavuz E[SUP]2[/SUP], Yayla E[SUP]3[/SUP], K?lbay H[SUP]4[/SUP], Altunok E[SUP]5[/SUP], Zahmacıoğlu O[SUP]6[/SUP], Badur S[SUP]7[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]AIM:[/h] The aim of this study was to determine the factors that influenced the decisions of family physicians working in primary care health services to receive influenza vaccines.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] This cross-sectional study was performed between June 2014 and September 2014. Physicians were reached electronically via e-mail. A self-reported questionnaire consisting of 50 items covering potential factors that may have influenced their decision to receive vaccination, including perceived risk, severity of the perceived risk, perceived benefit, perceived barriers, cues to action, attitudes, social influences and personal efficacy, was administered to the study participants. Cronbach's alpha for the questionnaire was determined to be 0.92 in the pilot study.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] The response rate was 27.5% (n=596). Regularly vaccinated physicians accounted for 27.3% of the responses. The median age was 41.84?7.80, and the median working duration of the group was 17.0?7.8years. The factors that led to increased vaccination compliance (p<0.05) included working duration, age, chronic disease history and living with a person over 65years. Nearly all major domains, i.e., perceived risk, severity of the perceived risk, perceived benefit, perceived barriers, attitudes, social influences and personal efficacy, there were differences between the compliant and noncompliant groups. Multi-regression analyses revealed that risk perception, organizational factors such as time and convenient vaccination increased vaccine compliance. However, the perceived necessity to be vaccinated annually had a negative effect on vaccination behaviour (p<0.05).
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Strategies aimed to increase the flu vaccination ratio among physicians that do not take different factors into account are more likely to be unsuccessful. In the planning and implementation of strategies aiming to increase the vaccination ratio among physicians, it is both necessary and important to take into account behavioural and organizational factors.
Copyright ? 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Family physicians; Health care workers; Influenza vaccination

PMID: 26899374 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom