tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
F1000Res
. 2025 May 19:14:500.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.162577.1. eCollection 2025. "It's messy and it's massive": How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era?
Melanie T Benson Marshall[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stephen Pinfield[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pamela Abbott[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrew Cox[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Juan Pablo Alperin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Natascha Chtena[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Alice Fleerackers[SUP] 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the global adoption of open science (OS) practices. However, as the pandemic subsides, the debate around OS continues to evolve. This study investigates how the pandemic has shaped the OS discourse and identifies key issues and challenges. Interviews were conducted with influential stakeholders across the research and publishing communities. The findings show that while many areas of debate remained constant, the ways in which they were discussed exposed underlying systemic challenges, which must be addressed if OS is to progress. These issues included the scope and definition of OS; regional variations in its implementation; the relationship between OS and fundamental questions of the purpose and practice of science; and the need to reform incentives and reward structures within the research system. A more complex understanding of OS is required, which takes into account the importance of equity and diversity and the challenges of implementing OS in different cultural and geographical contexts. The study emphasises the importance of shifting scientific culture to prioritise values such as quality, integrity, and openness, and reforming rewards structures to incentivise open practices.
Keywords: COVID-19; Open science; open access; preprints; science communication; scientific culture.
. 2025 May 19:14:500.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.162577.1. eCollection 2025. "It's messy and it's massive": How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era?
Melanie T Benson Marshall[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stephen Pinfield[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pamela Abbott[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrew Cox[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Juan Pablo Alperin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Natascha Chtena[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Alice Fleerackers[SUP] 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 40529634
- PMCID: PMC12171716
- DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.162577.1
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the global adoption of open science (OS) practices. However, as the pandemic subsides, the debate around OS continues to evolve. This study investigates how the pandemic has shaped the OS discourse and identifies key issues and challenges. Interviews were conducted with influential stakeholders across the research and publishing communities. The findings show that while many areas of debate remained constant, the ways in which they were discussed exposed underlying systemic challenges, which must be addressed if OS is to progress. These issues included the scope and definition of OS; regional variations in its implementation; the relationship between OS and fundamental questions of the purpose and practice of science; and the need to reform incentives and reward structures within the research system. A more complex understanding of OS is required, which takes into account the importance of equity and diversity and the challenges of implementing OS in different cultural and geographical contexts. The study emphasises the importance of shifting scientific culture to prioritise values such as quality, integrity, and openness, and reforming rewards structures to incentivise open practices.
Keywords: COVID-19; Open science; open access; preprints; science communication; scientific culture.