• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

F1000Res . Association of smoking status with hospitalisation for COVID-19 compared with other respiratory viruses a year previous: a case-control s

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
F1000Res


. 2021 Aug 24;10:846.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.55502.2. eCollection 2021.
Association of smoking status with hospitalisation for COVID-19 compared with other respiratory viruses a year previous: a case-control study at a single UK National Health Service trust


David Simons[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Olga Perski[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Lion Shahab[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jamie Brown[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Robin Bailey[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether smoking increases the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation. We first examined the association of smoking status with hospitalisation for COVID-19 compared with hospitalisation for other respiratory viral infections a year previous. Second, we examined the concordance between smoking status recorded on the electronic health record (EHR) and the contemporaneous medical notes. Methods: This case-control study enrolled adult patients (446 cases and 211 controls) at a single National Health Service trust in London, UK. The outcome variable was type of hospitalisation (COVID-19 vs. another respiratory virus a year previous). The exposure variable was smoking status (never/former/current smoker). Logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic position and comorbidities were performed. The study protocol and analyses were pre-registered in April 2020 on the Open Science Framework. Results: Current smokers had lower odds of being hospitalised with COVID-19 compared with other respiratory viruses a year previous (OR [SUB]adj[/SUB]=0.55, 95% CI=0.31-0.96, p=.04). There was no significant association among former smokers (OR [SUB]adj[/SUB]=1.08, 95% CI=0.72-1.65, p=.70). Smoking status recorded on the EHR (compared with the contemporaneous medical notes) was incorrectly recorded for 168 (79.6%) controls (χ [SUP]2[/SUP](3)=256.5, p=<0.001) and 60 cases (13.5%) (χ [SUP]2[/SUP](3)=34.2, p=<0.001). Conclusions: In a single UK hospital trust, current smokers had reduced odds of being hospitalised with COVID-19 compared with other respiratory viruses a year previous, although it is unclear whether this association is causal. Targeted post-discharge recording of smoking status may account for the greater EHR-medical notes concordance observed in cases compared with controls.

Keywords: COVID-19; case-control study; hospitalisation; respiratory infections; smoking; tobacco.
 
Back
Top Bottom