• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Extensive hospital in-ward clustering revealed by molecular characterization of influenza A virus infection

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 3. pii: ciaa108. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa108. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Extensive hospital in-ward clustering revealed by molecular characterization of influenza A virus infection.[/h]
Sansone M[SUP]1[/SUP], Andersson M[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Gustavsson L[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Andersson LM[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Nord?n R[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Westin J[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] Nosocomial transmission of influenza A virus infection is not fully recognized. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of hospitalized patients with influenza A virus (InfA) infection during an entire season and to investigate in-ward transmission at a large acute-care hospital.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] During the season 2016-17 all hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with laboratory-verified (real-time PCR) InfA were identified. Cases were characterized according to age, sex, co-morbidity, antiviral therapy, viral load expressed as cycle threshold (Ct) values, length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day mortality and whether the InfA infection met criteria for a health-care-associated infection (HCAI). Respiratory samples positive for InfA collected at the same wards within 7 days were chosen for whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and phylogenetic analysis was performed to detect clustering. For reference, concurrent InfA strains from patients with community-acquired infection were included.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] We identified a total of 435 InfA cases, of which 114 (26%) met the HCAI-criteria. The overall 30-day mortality rate was higher among patients with HCAI (9.6% vs. 4.6% among non-HCAI), although the difference was not statistically significant in multivariable analysis, where age was the only independent risk factor for death (p<0.05). We identified 8 closely related clusters (involving ≥3 cases) and another 10 pairs of strains supporting in-ward transmission.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] We found that in-ward transmission of InfA occurs frequently and that health-care-associated influenza may have a severe outcome. WGS may be used for outbreak investigations as well as for evaluation of the effect of preventive measures.
? The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] hospital outbreak; infection-control; influenza; nosocomial; phylogeny; polymerase chain reaction; transmission; whole-genome sequencing

PMID: 32011654 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa108
 
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 3. pii: ciaa108. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa108. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Extensive hospital in-ward clustering revealed by molecular characterization of influenza A virus infection.[/h]
Sansone M[SUP]1[/SUP], Andersson M[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Gustavsson L[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Andersson LM[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Nord?n R[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Westin J[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] Nosocomial transmission of influenza A virus infection is not fully recognized. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of hospitalized patients with influenza A virus (InfA) infection during an entire season and to investigate in-ward transmission at a large acute-care hospital.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] During the season 2016-17 all hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with laboratory-verified (real-time PCR) InfA were identified. Cases were characterized according to age, sex, co-morbidity, antiviral therapy, viral load expressed as cycle threshold (Ct) values, length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day mortality and whether the InfA infection met criteria for a health-care-associated infection (HCAI). Respiratory samples positive for InfA collected at the same wards within 7 days were chosen for whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and phylogenetic analysis was performed to detect clustering. For reference, concurrent InfA strains from patients with community-acquired infection were included.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] We identified a total of 435 InfA cases, of which 114 (26%) met the HCAI-criteria. The overall 30-day mortality rate was higher among patients with HCAI (9.6% vs. 4.6% among non-HCAI), although the difference was not statistically significant in multivariable analysis, where age was the only independent risk factor for death (p<0.05). We identified 8 closely related clusters (involving ≥3 cases) and another 10 pairs of strains supporting in-ward transmission.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] We found that in-ward transmission of InfA occurs frequently and that health-care-associated influenza may have a severe outcome. WGS may be used for outbreak investigations as well as for evaluation of the effect of preventive measures.
? The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] hospital outbreak; infection-control; influenza; nosocomial; phylogeny; polymerase chain reaction; transmission; whole-genome sequencing

PMID: 32011654 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa108

Do you think it could be because of the previously occuring illness? https://flutrackers.com/forum/forum...responds-to-change-in-virus-subtype-dominance
 
the difference was not statistically significant in multivariable analysis


previous diseases were probably more frequent or more important in the first group
 
Back
Top Bottom