• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Expert Rev Vaccines . Who is more likely to hesitate to accept COVID-19 vaccine: a cross-sectional survey in China

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Expert Rev Vaccines


. 2021 Dec 27.
doi: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2019581. Online ahead of print.
Who is more likely to hesitate to accept COVID-19 vaccine: a cross-sectional survey in China


Peng Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kaisheng Fan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hanwen Guan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qiao Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Xuejing Bi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yangmu Huang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Libo Liang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Abdul Rahman Khoso[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mingli Jiao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zheng Kang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yanhua Hao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qunhong Wu[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The aim of our study was to identify factors associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)vaccine willingness in China to aid future public health actions to improve vaccination.
Research design and methods: This study was conducted in August 2020 using a mixed-method approach, including a cross-sectional self-administered anonymous questionnaire survey and in-depth interviews with community residents in China.
Results: : Of the participants, 30.9% showedCOVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Being female(OR=1.297), having poor health(OR=1.312), having non-health or medical-related occupations (OR=1.129), no COVID-19 infection experience(OR=1.523), living with vulnerable family members(OR=1.294), less knowledge(OR=1.371), less attention to COVID-19 information(OR=1.430), less trust in official media(OR=1.336), less perceived susceptibility to COVID-19(OR=1.367), and less protective behavior(OR=1.195) were more likely to hesitate. Qualitative research has shown that they doubt the importance and necessity, as well as the effectiveness and safety of the vaccination. The economic and service accessibility of the vaccination was an impediment to their vaccine acceptance.
Conclusion: Nearly one-thirdof people showed hesitancy to accept COVID-19 vaccination in China. Our findings highlight that health communication and publicity should be performed for the targeted population, and immunization programs should be designed to remove underlying barriers to vaccine uptake.

Keywords: COVID-19; China; vaccination; vaccine acceptance; vaccine hesitancy; vaccine willingness
 
Back
Top Bottom