• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Expert Rev Vaccines . Mapping and ranking outcomes for the evaluation of seasonal influenza vaccine efficacy and effectiveness: a delphi study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Expert Rev Vaccines


. 2024 Jun 13.
doi: 10.1080/14760584.2024.2367457. Online ahead of print. Mapping and ranking outcomes for the evaluation of seasonal influenza vaccine efficacy and effectiveness: a delphi study

Chiara de Waure[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elisabetta Alti[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Vincenzo Baldo[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Paolo Bonanni[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Michele Conversano[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Alberto Fedele[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Giovanni Gabutti[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Roberto Ieraci[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Francesco Landi[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Raffaele Landolfi[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Andrea Orsi[SUP] 11 12 [/SUP], Caterina Rizzo[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Alessandro Rossi[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Alberto Villani[SUP] 15 16 [/SUP], Francesco Vitale[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Alexander Domnich[SUP] 12 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Protection provided by seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV) may be measured against numerous outcomes and their heterogeneity may hamper decision-making. The aim of this study was to explore outcomes used for estimation of SIV efficacy/effectiveness (VE) and obtain expert consensus on their importance.
Research design and methods: An umbrella review was first conducted to collect and map outcomes considered in systematic reviews of SIV VE. A Delphi study was then performed to reach expert convergence on the importance of single outcomes, measured on a 9-point Likert scale, in principal target groups, namely children, working-age adults, older adults, subjects with co-morbidities and pregnant women.
Results: Literature review identified 489 outcomes. Following data reduction, 20 outcomes were selected for the Delphi process. After two Delphi rounds and a final consensus meeting, convergence was reached. All 20 outcomes were judged important or critically important. More severe outcomes, such as influenza-related hospital encounters and mortality with or without laboratory confirmation, were generally top-ranked across all target groups (median scores ≥ 8 out of 9).
Conclusions: Rather than focusing on laboratory-confirmed infection per se, experimental and observational VE studies should include more severe influenza-related outcomes because they are expected to exercise a greater impact on decision-making.

Keywords: Delphi method; Influenza; Influenza vaccines; Outcome assessment; Vaccine effectiveness; Vaccine efficacy.

 
Back
Top Bottom