• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Expert Rev Vaccines . Adverse reaction characteristics of five COVID-19 vaccines across different technology platforms: a pooled analysis of nine cl

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Expert Rev Vaccines


. 2025 Dec;24(1):339-349.
doi: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2502031. Epub 2025 May 7. Adverse reaction characteristics of five COVID-19 vaccines across different technology platforms: a pooled analysis of nine clinical trials

Yue Liu[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Qian Liu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lai-Run Jin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wei-Wei Han[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ming-Wei Wei[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Si-Yue Jia[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Feng-Cai Zhu[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jing-Xin Li[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article Abstract

Background: Evidence regarding the comparative safety of different COVID-19 vaccines remains limited. This study aims to characterize and compare the safety profiles of five COVID-19 vaccines in terms of adverse reactions after immunization.
Research design and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adverse reactions reported among adults aged 18-59 years from nine clinical trials. The analyzed vaccines included inactivated, recombinant protein, intranasal influenza-vectored, aerosolized and intramuscular Ad5 vectored COVID-19 vaccines. Factor analysis and association rule analysis were used to characterize adverse reaction patterns, while multivariate logistic regression was employed to assess the influence of vaccine type and demographic factors.
Results: Inactivated, recombinant, and intramuscular Ad5 vectored vaccines commonly caused injection site pain, fatigue, headache, and pyrexia from the SOC of 'General disorders and administration site conditions.' Intranasal influenza-vectored vaccines mainly cause respiratory symptoms such as rhinorrhea and nasal congestion, while dry mouth and oropharyngeal pain from 'Gastrointestinal disorders' were primarily observed in aerosolized Ad5 vectored vaccines. Younger age (p < 0.001), female sex (p = 0.001), comorbidities (p < 0.001), and intramuscular Ad5 vectored vaccines (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher adverse reaction risks.
Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccines developed through different technological approaches have distinct adverse reaction profiles.

Keywords: Adverse reactions; COVID-19 vaccines; aerosolized Ad5 vectored vaccine; inactivated vaccine; intramuscular Ad5 vectored vaccine; intranasal influenza-vectored vaccine; recombinant protein vaccine; retrospective analysis.

 
Back
Top Bottom