• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Expert Rev Vaccines . A clinical and economic assessment of adjuvanted trivalent versus standard egg-derived quadrivalent influenza vaccines among o

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Expert Rev Vaccines


. 2023 Dec 11.
doi: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2293237. Online ahead of print. A clinical and economic assessment of adjuvanted trivalent versus standard egg-derived quadrivalent influenza vaccines among older adults in the United States during the 2018-19 and 2019-20 influenza seasons

Myron J Levin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Victoria Divino[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Maarten J Postma[SUP] 3 4 5 [/SUP], Stephen I Pelton[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Zifan Zhou[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mitch DeKoven[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Joaquin Mould-Quevedo[SUP] 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article Abstract

Background: Clinical evidence supports use of enhanced influenza vaccines in older adults. Few economic outcome studies have compared adjuvanted trivalent inactivated (aIIV3) and standard egg-derived quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV4e).
Research design and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted leveraging deidentified US hospital data linked to claims data during the 2018-19 and 2019-20 influenza seasons. Relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) was compared in adults aged ≥65 years receiving aIIV3 or IIV4e using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Poisson regression. An economic assessment quantified potential real-world cost savings.
Results: The study included 715,807 aIIV3 and 320,991 IIV4e recipients in the 2018-19 and 844,169 aIIV3 and 306,270 IIV4e recipients in the 2019-20 influenza seasons. aIIV3 was significantly more effective than IIV4e in preventing cardiorespiratory disease (2018-19 rVE = 6.2%; and 2019-20 rVE = 6.0%) and respiratory disease (2018-19 rVE = 8.9%; and 2019-20 rVE = 10.1%). During the 2018-19 influenza season cardiorespiratory hospitalization cost savings for the aIIV3 population was $392 M, and $221 M for the 2019-20 season. Respiratory hospitalization cost savings for the aIIV3 population was $145 M and $97 M, respectively.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that aIIV3 provides clinical and economic advantages versus IIV4e in the elderly.

Keywords: Adjuvanted; Elderly; Relative vaccine effectiveness; aIIV3; economic assessment; influenza vaccine.

 
Back
Top Bottom