• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Exp Ther Med . Efficiency of antiviral treatment in COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Exp Ther Med


. 2021 Jun;21(6):648.
doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10080. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
Efficiency of antiviral treatment in COVID-19


Nicoleta Negrut[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Adriana Codrean[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ioana Hodisan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Simona Bungau[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Delia Mirela Tit[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ruxandra Marin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Tapan Behl[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Florin Banica[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Camelia C Diaconu[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Delia Carmen Nistor-Cseppento[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic is responsible for generating a global effort to discover urgent therapeutic solutions to limit the human damage caused by COVID-19. In the period of April to June 2020, 105 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 met the conditions for inclusion in the present study. They were treated with antiviral therapy according to local guidelines: D group (53 cases), treated with darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r); and K group (52 cases), treated with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r). Patients from the K group required 7.5 days of hospitalization less compared to those from the D group (P<0.001). The blood oxygen saturation values recorded in the groups were statistically different [K group (94.02?3.12%) vs. D group (92.13?4.24%), P=0.010]. The percentage of patients with unsatisfactory clinical evolution were non-significantly higher in the D group compared with the K group [20 (37.74%) vs. 12 (23.08%), P=0.157]. We did not note statistically significant differences between the two groups tracked considering the values for the Brescia-COVID Respiratory Severity Scale (BCRSS) of the patients with unsatisfactory clinical evolution, nor of the chest CT' evolution after 10 days of therapy. We did not register significant adverse effects after antiviral therapy in the two groups. Antiviral therapy with LPV/r had some favorable results compared to DRV/r in patients with COVID-19. Both therapies were well tolerated.

Keywords: COVID-19; Kaletra; SARS-CoV-2; darunavir; lopinavir.
 
Back
Top Bottom