• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Examining the use of antiviral prophylaxis for influenza outbreaks in residential aged care facilities in NSW, Australia

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Mar 10;30(1). pii: 29121904. doi: 10.17061/phrp29121904. [h=1]Examining the use of antiviral prophylaxis for influenza outbreaks in residential aged care facilities in NSW, Australia.[/h]
Meshreky W[SUP]1[/SUP], Hennessy D[SUP]2[/SUP], Gilmour R[SUP]3[/SUP], Tobin S[SUP]3[/SUP], Sheppeard V[SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Influenza attack rates in closed population settings, such as residential aged care facilities (RACFs), can be more than 50% during annual epidemics. Uncertainty about the effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) as prophylaxis for influenza outbreaks has led to variations in their use in RACFs in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.
[h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] To examine the use of prophylactic NAIs by NSW RACFs for residents during influenza outbreaks in the 2015 influenza season.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] A prospective cohort study of influenza outbreaks reported to NSW Public Health Units from 1 June 2015 - 31 October 2015.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Eighty-eight RACFs reported influenza outbreaks; 86 were included in the study. Fifty-two RACFs used prophylactic NAIs; 34 did not. The median time to start NAI prophylaxis from the onset date of the first case was 8.5 days (range 2-23). The average proportion of residents within a facility that received prophylaxis was 51%percnt; (range 0.7-95).
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Variations in the use of prophylactic NAIs exist across RACFs. Earlier initiation of NAI prophylaxis, improved resident coverage where appropriate and other practice changes are recommended for the management of influenza outbreaks in RACFs.


PMID: 32152617 DOI: 10.17061/phrp29121904
Free full text
 
Back
Top Bottom