• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Examination of the British Columbia Influenza Prevention Policy for healthcare workers: Phase 1 qualitative case study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Apr 4:1-29. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1460296. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Examination of the British Columbia Influenza Prevention Policy for healthcare workers: Phase 1 qualitative case study.[/h] McPherson CM[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Halperin DM[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Henry B[SUP]5[/SUP], Di Castri A[SUP]1[/SUP], Kwong JC[SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]7,[/SUP][SUP]8,[/SUP][SUP]9,[/SUP][SUP]10[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] In August 2012, British Columbia became the first Canadian province to implement a province-wide Influenza Prevention Policy requiring all healthcare workers (HCWs) in residential and acute care facilities to either be immunized against influenza, or wear masks in patient care areas during the influenza season. This qualitative case study sought to understand the key facilitators and barriers involved in developing and implementing British Columbia's Influenza Prevention Policy. An explanatory qualitative case study approach was selected for this project. Data were collected through the review of 110 documents (policy and planning documents, implementation tools, press releases, communication materials, etc.), and through 7 focus groups with policy implementation team members (n = 48). Focus group interview transcripts were analyzed using Framework Analysis methods, and Prior's approach guided document analysis. Four themes were identified: (1) Clashing paradigms, (2) Policy implementation gaps, (3) Pathways of power, and (4) Personal impacts. Issues embedded in macro-, meso-, and micro-level contexts, and planning across the province, were identified as critical to policy implementation. A province-wide approach with senior-level engagement and dedicated resources is critical in a province-wide influenza prevention policy for HCW. Recommendations to improve large-scale implementation of condition-of-service influenza policies include: engaging stakeholders early, considering the complexity of political contexts, allotting time to plan appropriately, developing 'enforcement' plans, and providing education and skills to frontline providers.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] British Columbia; Influenza; condition-of-service policy; health care workers; immunization policy; influenza immunization; policy case study

PMID: 29617181 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1460296
 
Back
Top Bottom