• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Evaluation of three commercially available influenza A type-specific blocking-ELISA assays for seroepidemiological studies of influenza A virus infect

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012 Jan 4. [Epub ahead of print]
Evaluation of three commercially available influenza A type-specific blocking-ELISA assays for seroepidemiological studies of influenza A virus infection in pigs.
Tse M, Kim M, Chan CH, Ho PL, Ma SK, Guan Y, Peiris JS.
Source

State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases & School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Abstract

The reverse zoonotic transmission of the pandemic H1N1 2009 virus to swine necessitates enhanced surveillance of swine for influenza virus infection. Using a well characterized panel of naturally infected swine sera we evaluate and optimize the performance of three commercially available competitive ELISA assays, IDEXX? Influenza A Ab test, IDEXX? AI MultiS-Screen Ab Test and IDVet ID Screen? Influenza A Antibody Competition ELISA kit for detecting influenza type A reactive antibodies in swine. ROC analysis suggests that adjustment of the manufacturer recommended cut-off values would optimize sensitivity and specificity of these assays making them applicable for sero-epidemiology studies of swine influenza. Using such optimized cut-off levels, sensitivity and specificity of the IDEXX? Influenza A Ab test was 86% and 89% respectively; for IDEXX? AI MultiS-Screen Ab Test was 91% and 87% and for IDVet ID Screen? Influenza A was 95% and 79%, respectively.

PMID:
22219314
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22219314
 
Back
Top Bottom