• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Evaluation of the efficiency of differential diagnosis of influenza by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vopr Virusol. 2012 Jan-Feb;57(1):42-5.
[Evaluation of the efficiency of differential diagnosis of influenza by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction].
[Article in Russian]
[No authors listed]
Abstract

The paper gives the results of a comparative analysis of the detection of influenza viruses in clinical samples, by using multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and by virus isolation in MDCK cell cultures. The investigation employed 267 nasopharyngeal swab specimens obtained from patients with influenza symptoms during two epidemic seasons (2008-2009 and 2009-2010). Influenza viruses were found in 104 samples (48 with influenza A virus (IAV) and 56 with influenza B virus (IBV)) by multiplex RT-RCR and in 84 samples (35 with IAV and 49 with IBV) by a cultural technique. The results of detection of influenza viruses by the two methods showed 89.4% agreement. The diagnostic sensitivity of multiplex RT-PCR testing a panel of the clinical samples in question was estimated to be 94.3% for IAV and 95.9% for IBV. The diagnostic sensitivity of multiplex RT-PCR in virus detection was demonstrated to be not only highly competitive with virus isolation, but also superior to the latter.

PMID:
22624473
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22624473
 
Back
Top Bottom