• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Evaluation of a commercial ELISA for H5 low pathogenic avian influenza virus antibody detection in duck sera using Bayesian methods

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Virol Methods. 2013 May 28. pii: S0166-0934(13)00182-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.05.002. [Epub ahead of print]
Evaluation of a commercial ELISA for H5 low pathogenic avian influenza virus antibody detection in duck sera using Bayesian methods.
Audrey S, Marie-Odile LB, Carole G, Isabelle P, Nicolas R, St?phanie B, V?ronique J.
Source

(French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety), Ploufragan/Plouzan? Laboratory, Avian and Rabbit Virology, Immunology and Parasitology Unit (VIPAC, French national reference laboratory for avian influenza and Newcastle disease), B.P.53, 22440 Ploufragan, France. Electronic address: audrey.schmitz@anses.fr.
Abstract

Following the emergence of highly pathogenic avian influenza (AI), active surveillance of infections due to the H5 and H7 subtypes in poultry has increased and been made compulsory in Europe since 2002, by means of annual serological surveys using the haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test. Domestic anseriforms, particularly ducks and geese, are more frequently infected by H5 low pathogenic AI virus, often subclinally, and represent a threat for other terrestrial poultry. 1,783 sera, mainly from ducks, have been used to evaluate and compare a commercial ELISA kit detecting H5 antibodies with the currently recommended HI test. Different approaches to calculating specificity and sensitivity have been used, including the original Bayesian method. Results were similar when data were analyzed at the individual and batch levels, and when using different methods of calculation. However, results showed that H5 ELISA had both a higher sensitivity and a lower specificity than the HI test. Given that sensitivity is the most important factor for a screening test, H5 ELISA could therefore be recommended for AI surveillance, followed in cases of positivity by molecular tests aimed at detecting the virus gene.

Copyright ? 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PMID:
23727545
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23727545
 
Back
Top Bottom