• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eurosurv. Public preferences for vaccination programmes during pandemics caused by pathogens transmitted through respiratory droplets ? a discrete cho

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eurosurveillance, Volume 21, Issue 22, 02 June 2016
Research article

Public preferences for vaccination programmes during pandemics caused by pathogens transmitted through respiratory droplets ? a discrete choice experiment in four European countries, 2013


D Determann [SUP]1[/SUP] [SUP]2[/SUP] , IJ Korfage [SUP]1[/SUP] , A Fagerlin [SUP]3[/SUP] [SUP]4[/SUP] , EW Steyerberg [SUP]1[/SUP] , MC Bliemer [SUP]5[/SUP] , HA Voeten [SUP]6[/SUP] , JH Richardus [SUP]1[/SUP] [SUP]6[/SUP] , MS Lambooij [SUP]2[/SUP] , EW de Bekker-Grob [SUP]1[/SUP]
+ Author affiliations
1. Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
2. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
3. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
4. VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
5. The University of Sydney Business School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
6. Rotterdam-Rijnmond Municipal Public Health Service, Rotterdam, the Netherlands


Correspondence: Esther W de Bekker-Grob (e.debekker@erasmusmc.nl)








Citation style for this article: Determann D, Korfage IJ, Fagerlin A, Steyerberg EW, Bliemer MC, Voeten HA, Richardus JH, Lambooij MS, de Bekker-Grob EW. Public preferences for vaccination programmes during pandemics caused by pathogens transmitted through respiratory droplets ? a discrete choice experiment in four European countries, 2013. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(22):pii=30247. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.22.30247

Received:18 March 2015; Accepted:02 June 2016

[h=4][/h]
This study aims to quantify and compare preferences of citizens from different European countries for vaccination programme characteristics during pandemics, caused by pathogens which are transmitted through respiratory droplets. Internet panel members, nationally representative based on age, sex, educational level and region, of four European Union Member States (Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and Sweden, n = 2,068) completed an online discrete choice experiment. These countries, from different geographical areas of Europe, were chosen because of the availability of high-quality Internet panels and because of the cooperation between members of the project entitled Effective Communication in Outbreak Management: development of an evidence-based tool for Europe (ECOM). Data were analysed using panel latent class regression models. In the case of a severe pandemic scenario, vaccine effectiveness was the most important characteristic determining vaccination preference in all countries, followed by the body that advises on vaccination. In Sweden, the advice of family and/or friends and the advice of physicians strongly affected vaccine preferences, in contrast to Poland and Spain, where the advice of (international) health authorities was more decisive. Irrespective of pandemic scenario or vaccination programme characteristics, the predicted vaccination uptakes were lowest in Sweden, and highest in Poland. To increase vaccination uptake during future pandemics, the responsible authorities should align with other important stakeholders in the country and communicate in a coordinated manner.


full article

http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=22491
 
Back
Top Bottom