• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eurosurv. COVID-19: cross-border contact tracing in Germany, February to April 2020

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
COVID-19: cross-border contact tracing in Germany, February to April 2020
Introduction

The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) managed the exchange of cross-border contact tracing data between public health authorities (PHA) in Germany and abroad during the early COVID-19 pandemic.

Aim

We describe the extent of cross-border contact tracing and its challenges.

Methods

We analysed cross-border COVID-19 contact tracing events from 3 February to 5 April 2020 using information exchanged through the European Early Warning Response System and communication with International Health Regulation national focal points. We described events by PHA, number of contacts and exposure context.

Results

The RKI processed 467 events, initiating contact to PHA 1,099 times (median?=?1; interquartile range (IQR): 1?2) and sharing data on 5,099 contact persons. Of 327 (70%) events with known exposure context, the most commonly reported exposures were aircraft (n?=?64; 20%), cruise ships (n?=?24; 7%) and non-transport contexts (n?=?210; 64%). Cruise ship and aircraft exposures generated more contacts with authorities (median?=?10; IQR: 2?16, median?=?4; IQR: 2?11) and more contact persons (median?=?60; IQR: 9?269, median?=?2; IQR: 1?3) than non-transport exposures (median?=?1; IQR: 1?6 and median?=?1; IQR: 1?2). The median time spent on contact tracing was highest for cruise ships: 5 days (IQR: 3?9).

Conclusion

In the COVID-19 pandemic, cross-border contact tracing is considered a critical component of the outbreak response. While only a minority of international contact tracing activities were related to exposure events in transport, they contributed substantially to the workload. The numerous communications highlight the need for fast and efficient global outbreak communication channels between PHA.





[SUP]full article[/SUP]

https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.10.2001236
 
Back
Top Bottom