• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Euro Surveill. National surveillance of pandemic influenza A(H1N1) infection-related admissions to intensive care units during the 2009?10 winter peak

Giuseppe

Emeritus
National surveillance of pandemic influenza A(H1N1) infection-related admissions to intensive care units during the 2009?10 winter peak in Denmark... (Abstract, edited)


[Source: Eurosurveillance, full text: <cite cite="http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19743">Eurosurveillance - View Article</cite>. Abstract, edited.]

Eurosurveillance, Volume 15, Issue 49, 09 December 2010

Surveillance and outbreak reports

National surveillance of pandemic influenza A(H1N1) infection-related admissions to intensive care units during the 2009?10 winter peak in Denmark: two complementary approaches

S Gubbels 1,2, A Perner 3, P Valentiner-Branth 1, K M?lbak 1

1. Department of Epidemiology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
2. European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden
3. Intensive care unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Citation style for this article: Gubbels S, Perner A, Valentiner-Branth P, M?lbak K. National surveillance of pandemic influenza A(H1N1) infection-related admissions to intensive care units during the 2009?10 winter peak in Denmark: two complementary approaches. Euro Surveill. 2010;15(49):pii=19743. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19743

Date of submission: 22 July 2010


Surveillance of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) in Denmark was enhanced during the 2009?10 winter season with a system monitoring the burden of the pandemic on intensive care units (ICUs), in order to inform policymakers and detect shortages in ICUs in a timely manner. Between week 46 of 2009 and week 11 of 2010, all 36 relevant Danish ICUs reported in two ways: aggregate data were reported online and case-based data on paper. Cases to be reported were defined as patients admitted to an ICU with laboratory-confirmed 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) infection or clinically suspected illness after close contact with a laboratory-confirmed case. Aggregate numbers of cases were reported weekly: during weeks 48-51 (the peak), reporting was daily. The case-based reports contained demographic and clinical information. The aggregate surveillance registered 93 new cases, the case-based surveillance 61, of whom 53 were laboratory confirmed. The proportion of beds used for influenza patients did not exceed 4.5% of the national capacity. Hospitals with cases used a median of 11% of bed capacity (range: 3?40%). Of the patients for whom information was available, 15 of 48 patients developed renal insufficiency, 19 of 50 developed septic shock and 17 of 53 died. The number of patients with pandemic influenza could be managed within the national bed capacity, although the impact on some ICUs was substantial. The combination of both reporting methods (collecting aggregate and case-based data) proved to be useful for monitoring the burden of the pandemic on ICUs.

-
------
 
Back
Top Bottom