• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Euro Surveill. Assessment of the bio-preparedness and of the training of the French hospital laboratories in the event of biological threat

Giuseppe

Emeritus
[Source: Eurosurveillance, full text: (LINK). Abstract, edited.]

Eurosurveillance, Volume 17, Issue 45, 08 November 2012

Research articles

Assessment of the bio-preparedness and of the training of the French hospital laboratories in the event of biological threat


A M?rens<SUP>1</SUP>, J D Cavallo<SUP>2</SUP>, F Thibault<SUP>3</SUP>, F Salicis<SUP>4</SUP>, J F Munoz<SUP>5</SUP>, R Courcol ()<SUP>6</SUP>, P Binder<SUP>7</SUP>
  1. H?pital B?gin, Service de Sant? des Arm?es (Military Health Service), Saint-Mand?, France
  2. Ecole du Val-de-Gr?ce, Service de Sant? des Arm?es (Military Health Service), Paris, France
  3. Institut de Recherche Biom?dicale des Arm?es (French Armed Biomedical Research Institute), Grenoble, France
  4. Direction G?n?rale de la Sant? (General Direction of Health), Paris, France
  5. Laboratory of Hydrology of Nancy, Agence Nationale de S?curit? Sanitaire de l?Alimentation, de l?Environnement et du Travail (ANSES, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety), Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France
  6. Institute of Microbiology, Centre Hospitalier R?gional Universitaire de Lille,(Lille University Medical Center), University of Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
  7. Institut National de la Sant? et de la Recherche M?dicale (INSERM, National Institute of Health and Medical Research), Paris, France
<HR>
Citation style for this article: M?rens A, Cavallo JD, Thibault F, Salicis F, Munoz JF, Courcol R, Binder P. Assessment of the bio-preparedness and of the training of the French hospital laboratories in the event of biological threat. Euro Surveill. 2012;17(45):pii=20312. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20312
Date of submission: 31 October 2011
<HR>A national laboratory network ?Biotox-Piratox? was created in 2003 in France with the purpose of detecting, confirming and reporting potential biological and chemical threat agents. This network is divided into three levels: Level 1 is dedicated to the evaluation of risks (biological, chemical, radiological), to sampling and packing. Level 2 consists of university and military hospitals, who deal with biological specimens, and of environmental and veterinary laboratories, who deal with environmental and animal samples. Level 3 comprises national reference laboratories and the Jean M?rieux biosafety level (BSL)-4 laboratory in Lyon. This report presents the results of four bio-preparedness exercises to check critical points in the processing of samples. These exercises took place in 2007, 2009, 2010 and 2011. Each of them consisted of two parts. The first part was the identification of an unknown bacterial strain and its susceptibility to antibiotics used as a default in case of a bioterrorist event. The second part was the detection of Class III microorganisms, mainly by molecular techniques. The main lesson learnt in these exercises was that the key to successful detection of biological agents in case of a biological threat was standardisation and validation of the methods implemented by all the laboratories belonging to the network.
- --------
 
Back
Top Bottom