• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eur Radiol . Artificial Intelligence-assisted chest X-ray assessment scheme for COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur Radiol


. 2021 Jan 20.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07628-5. Online ahead of print.
Artificial Intelligence-assisted chest X-ray assessment scheme for COVID-19


Krithika Rangarajan[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Sumanyu Muku[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Amit Kumar Garg[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Pavan Gabra[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sujay Halkur Shankar[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Neeraj Nischal[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Kapil Dev Soni[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ashu Seith Bhalla[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Anant Mohan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Pawan Tiwari[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sushma Bhatnagar[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Raghav Bansal[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Atin Kumar[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Shivanand Gamanagati[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Richa Aggarwal[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Upendra Baitha[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ashutosh Biswas[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Arvind Kumar[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Pankaj Jorwal[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Shalimar[SUP] 4 [/SUP], A Shariff[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Naveet Wig[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Rajeshwari Subramanium[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Anjan Trikha[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Rajesh Malhotra[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Randeep Guleria[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Vinay Namboodiri[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Subhashis Banerjee[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Chetan Arora[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives: To study whether a trained convolutional neural network (CNN) can be of assistance to radiologists in differentiating Coronavirus disease (COVID)-positive from COVID-negative patients using chest X-ray (CXR) through an ambispective clinical study. To identify subgroups of patients where artificial intelligence (AI) can be of particular value and analyse what imaging features may have contributed to the performance of AI by means of visualisation techniques.
Methods: CXR of 487 patients were classified into [4] categories-normal, classical COVID, indeterminate, and non-COVID by consensus opinion of 2 radiologists. CXR which were classified as "normal" and "indeterminate" were then subjected to analysis by AI, and final categorisation provided as guided by prediction of the network. Precision and recall of the radiologist alone and radiologist assisted by AI were calculated in comparison to reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as the gold standard. Attention maps of the CNN were analysed to understand regions in the CXR important to the AI algorithm in making a prediction.
Results: The precision of radiologists improved from 65.9 to 81.9% and recall improved from 17.5 to 71.75 when assistance with AI was provided. AI showed 92% accuracy in classifying "normal" CXR into COVID or non-COVID. Analysis of attention maps revealed attention on the cardiac shadow in these "normal" radiographs.
Conclusion: This study shows how deployment of an AI algorithm can complement a human expert in the determination of COVID status. Analysis of the detected features suggests possible subtle cardiac changes, laying ground for further investigative studies into possible cardiac changes.
Key points: • Through an ambispective clinical study, we show how assistance with an AI algorithm can improve recall (sensitivity) and precision (positive predictive value) of radiologists in assessing CXR for possible COVID in comparison to RT-PCR. • We show that AI achieves the best results in images classified as "normal" by radiologists. We conjecture that possible subtle cardiac in the CXR, imperceptible to the human eye, may have contributed to this prediction. • The reported results may pave the way for a human computer collaboration whereby the expert with some help from the AI algorithm achieves higher accuracy in predicting COVID status on CXR than previously thought possible when considering either alone.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; COVID; Radiograph.
 
Back
Top Bottom