• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eur J Radiol Diagnostic Impact of Bedside Chest X-ray Features of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the Routine Admission at the Emergency Department: Case S

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur J Radiol


. 2020 May 26;129:109092.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109092. Online ahead of print.
Diagnostic Impact of Bedside Chest X-ray Features of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the Routine Admission at the Emergency Department: Case Series From Lombardy Region


Davide Ippolito[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anna Pecorelli[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Cesare Maino[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Carlo Capodaglio[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ilaria Mariani[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Teresa Giandola[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Davide Gandola[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ilaria Bianco[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Maria Ragusi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Cammillo Talei Franzesi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rocco Corso[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sandro Sironi[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the imaging features of routine admission chest X-ray in patients suspected for novel Coronavirus 2019 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.
Method: We retrospectively evaluated clinical and X-ray features in all patients referred to the emergency department for suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 1st and March 13th. A single radiologist with more than 15 years of experience in chest-imaging evaluated the presence and extent of alveolar opacities, reticulations, and/or pleural effusion. The percentage of lung involvement (range <25 % to 75-100 %) was also calculated. We stratified patients in groups according to the time interval between symptoms onset and X-ray imaging (≤ 5 and > 5 days) and according to age (≤ 50 and > 50 years old).
Results: A total of 518 patients were enrolled. Overall 314 patients had negative and 204 had positive RT-PCR results. Lung lesions in patients with SARS-Cov2 pneumonia primarily manifested as alveolar and interstitial opacities and were mainly bilateral (60.8 %). Lung abnormalities were more frequent and more severe by symptom duration and by increasing age. The sensitivity and specificity of chest X-ray at admission in the overall cohort were 57 % (95 % CI = 47-67) and 89 % (83-94), respectively. Sensitivity was higher for patients with symptom onset > 5 days compared to ≤ 5 days (76 % [62-87] vs 37 % [24-52]) and in patients > 50 years old compared to ≤ 50 years (59 % [48-69] vs 47 % [23-72]), at the expense of a slightly lower specificity (68 % [45-86] and 82 % [73-89], respectively).
Conclusions: Overall chest X-ray sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia was 57 %. Sensitivity was higher when symptoms had started more than 5 days before, at the expense of lesser specificity, while slightly higher in older patients in comparison to younger ones.

Keywords: Coronavirus; Infections; Radiography; Tomography; X-ray computed.
 
Back
Top Bottom