tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur J Public Health
. 2024 Oct 10:ckae145.
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae145. Online ahead of print. Sociodemographic differences in the response to changes in COVID-19 testing guidelines
Shambhavi Sharma[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Huiqi Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jesper Löve[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chioma Nwaru[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Magnus Gisslén[SUP] 2 3 4 [/SUP], Sara Byfors[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Niklas Hammar[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Anton Nilsson[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Jonas Björk[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Fredrik Nyberg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carl Bonander[SUP] 1 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Sweden emphasized voluntary guidelines over mandates. We exploited a rapid change and reversal of the Public Health Agency of Sweden's COVID-19 testing guidelines for vaccinated and recently infected individuals as a quasi-experiment to examine sociodemographic differences in the response to changes in pandemic guidelines. We analyzed daily polymerase chain reaction tests from 1 October 2021 to 15 December 2021, for vaccinated or recently infected adults (≥20 years; n = 1 596 321) from three Swedish regions (Stockholm, Örebro, and Dalarna). Using interrupted time series analysis, we estimated abrupt changes in testing rates at the two dates when the guidelines were changed (1 November and 22 November). Stratified analysis and meta-regression were employed to explore sociodemographic differences in the strength of the response to the guideline changes. Testing rates declined substantially when guideline against testing of vaccinated and recently infected individuals came into effect on 1 November [testing rate ratio: 0.50 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.41, 0.61)], and increased again from these lowered levels by a similar amount upon its reversal on 22 November [testing rate ratio: 2.19 (95% CI: 1.69, 2.85)]. Being Sweden-born, having higher household income, or higher education, were all associated with a stronger adherent response to the guideline changes. Adjusting for stratum-specific baseline testing rates and test-positivity did not influence the results. Our findings suggest that the population was responsive to the rapid changes in testing guidelines, but with clear sociodemographic differences in the strength of the response.
. 2024 Oct 10:ckae145.
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae145. Online ahead of print. Sociodemographic differences in the response to changes in COVID-19 testing guidelines
Shambhavi Sharma[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Huiqi Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jesper Löve[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chioma Nwaru[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Magnus Gisslén[SUP] 2 3 4 [/SUP], Sara Byfors[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Niklas Hammar[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Anton Nilsson[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Jonas Björk[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Fredrik Nyberg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carl Bonander[SUP] 1 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 39387529
- DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae145
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Sweden emphasized voluntary guidelines over mandates. We exploited a rapid change and reversal of the Public Health Agency of Sweden's COVID-19 testing guidelines for vaccinated and recently infected individuals as a quasi-experiment to examine sociodemographic differences in the response to changes in pandemic guidelines. We analyzed daily polymerase chain reaction tests from 1 October 2021 to 15 December 2021, for vaccinated or recently infected adults (≥20 years; n = 1 596 321) from three Swedish regions (Stockholm, Örebro, and Dalarna). Using interrupted time series analysis, we estimated abrupt changes in testing rates at the two dates when the guidelines were changed (1 November and 22 November). Stratified analysis and meta-regression were employed to explore sociodemographic differences in the strength of the response to the guideline changes. Testing rates declined substantially when guideline against testing of vaccinated and recently infected individuals came into effect on 1 November [testing rate ratio: 0.50 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.41, 0.61)], and increased again from these lowered levels by a similar amount upon its reversal on 22 November [testing rate ratio: 2.19 (95% CI: 1.69, 2.85)]. Being Sweden-born, having higher household income, or higher education, were all associated with a stronger adherent response to the guideline changes. Adjusting for stratum-specific baseline testing rates and test-positivity did not influence the results. Our findings suggest that the population was responsive to the rapid changes in testing guidelines, but with clear sociodemographic differences in the strength of the response.