• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eur J Hosp Pharm . A prospective, observational study to evaluate adverse drug reactions in patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir or hydrox

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur J Hosp Pharm


. 2021 Jan 15;ejhpharm-2020-002613.
doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002613. Online ahead of print.
A prospective, observational study to evaluate adverse drug reactions in patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir or hydroxychloroquine: a preliminary report


F?tima Falc?o[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Erica Viegas[SUP] 2 3 4 [/SUP], Ines Carmo[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Joana Soares[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Margarida Falcao[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Mariana Solano[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Patricia Cavaco[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Dina Mendes[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jo?o Rijo[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Pedro Povoa[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Antonio Pais Martins[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Eduarda Carmo[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Kamal Mansinho[SUP] 7 10 [/SUP], Candida Fonseca[SUP] 7 11 [/SUP], Luis Campos[SUP] 7 11 [/SUP], Ant?nio Carvalho[SUP] 3 11 [/SUP], Ana Mirco[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Helena Farinha[SUP] 2 3 5 [/SUP], Isabel Aldir[SUP] 3 7 10 [/SUP], Jos? Correia[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives: Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the pressure to minimise its impact on public health has led to the implementation of different therapeutic strategies, the efficacy of which for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was unknown at the time. Remdesivir (REM) was granted its first conditional marketing authorisation in the EU in June 2020. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and local health authorities all across the EU have since strongly recommended the implementation of pharmacovigilance activities aimed at further evaluating the safety of this new drug. The objective of this study was to evaluate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to either REM or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 in Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, a Portuguese hospital centre based in Lisbon. We present the preliminary results reporting plausible adverse effects of either HCQ or REM.
Methods: An observational cohort study was carried out between 16 March and 15 August 2020. Participants were divided into two cohorts: those prescribed an HCQ regimen, and those prescribed REM. Suspected ADRs were identified using an active monitoring model and reported to the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System through its online notification tool. The ADR cumulative incidence was compared between the two cohorts.
Results: The study included 149 patients, of whom 101 were treated with HCQ and the remaining 48 with REM. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two cohorts. A total of 102 ADRs were identified during the study period, with a greater incidence in the HCQ cohort compared with the REM cohort (47.5% vs 12.5%; p<0.001). Causality was assessed in 81 ADRs, all of which were considered possible.
Conclusions: Real-world data are crucial to further establish the safety profile for REM. HCQ is no longer recommended for the treatment of COVID-19.

Keywords: COVID-19; clinical medicine; drug monitoring; drug-related side effects and adverse reactions; hospital; pharmacy service.
 
Back
Top Bottom