• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis . Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal wash specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection in the setting of

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis


. 2020 Sep 17.
doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04039-8. Online ahead of print.
Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal wash specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection in the setting of sampling device shortage


Adrien Calame[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP], L?na Mazza[SUP] 5 6 7 [/SUP], Adriana Renzoni[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Laurent Kaiser[SUP] 5 6 7 [/SUP], Manuel Schibler[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

In the context of an unprecedented shortage of nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) or sample transport media during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis, alternative methods for sample collection are needed. To address this need, we validated a cell culture medium as a viral transport medium, and compared the analytical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR in nasal wash (NW), oropharyngeal swab (OPS), and NPS specimens. Both the clinical and analytical sensitivity were comparable in these three sample types. OPS and NW specimens may therefore represent suitable alternatives to NPS for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

Keywords: Diagnostic techniques; Nasal washes; Nasopharyngeal swab; Oropharyngeal swab; SARS-CoV-2; Upper respiratory tract infection.
 
Back
Top Bottom