• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eur J Cancer . Efficacy and safety of BNT162b2 vaccination in patients with solid cancer receiving anticancer therapy - a single centre prospective

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur J Cancer


. 2021 Sep 8;157:124-131.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.007. Online ahead of print.
Efficacy and safety of BNT162b2 vaccination in patients with solid cancer receiving anticancer therapy - a single centre prospective study


Einat S Shmueli[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Amit Itay[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ofer Margalit[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Raanan Berger[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sharon Halperin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Menucha Jurkowicz[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Einav G Levin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Itzchak Levy[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Liraz Olmer[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Gili Regev-Yochay[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Yaniv Lustig[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Galia Rahav[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Aim: Patients with cancer are at an increased risk for severe coronavirus disease of 2019, thus data on the safety and efficacy of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are essential. We conducted this prospective study of patients with cancer vaccinated with BNT162b2 and monitored for antibody response and safety. The aim was to evaluate the rate of seropositivity and define predictors for non-reactive immune response. Furthermore, we evaluated the frequency and the severity of adverse events.
Methods: The study included patients with solid tumours undergoing anticancer treatment and immunocompetent health-care workers serving as controls. Serum titres of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralising antibodies were measured 2-4 weeks after each vaccine dose.
Results: The analysis included 129 patients, of which 70.5% patients were metastatic. Patients were treated with chemotherapy (55%), immunotherapy (34.1%), biological agents (24.8%), hormonal treatment (8.5%) and radiotherapy (4.6%), that were given either alone or in combinations. The seropositivity rate among patients with cancer and controls was 32.4% versus 59.8% (p < 0.0001) after the first dose and 84.1% versus 98.9% (p < 0.0001) after the second dose, respectively. Median RBD-IgG titre was lower among patients than controls (p < 0.0001). Patients who were seronegative after the second dose had significantly more comorbidities than that with patients with seropositivity (77.8% vs 41.1%, respectively, p = 0.0042).
Conclusion: Adequate antibody response after BNT162b2 vaccination was achieved after two doses but not after one dose, in patients with cancer vaccinated during anticancer therapy.

Keywords: COVID19; Cancer; Co-morbidities; IgG; Immunoglobulin; Oncology; SARS-CoV-2; Seronegativity; Seropositivity; Vaccine.
 
Back
Top Bottom