• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eur J Anaesthesiol . Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in coronavirus disease 2019: A nationwide cohort analysis of 4279 runs from Germany

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur J Anaesthesiol


. 2022 Feb 17.
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001670. Online ahead of print.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in coronavirus disease 2019: A nationwide cohort analysis of 4279 runs from Germany


Benjamin Friedrichson[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jan A Kloka, Vanessa Neef, Haitham Mutlak, Oliver Old, Kai Zacharowski, Florian Piekarski



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: In the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many retrospective single-centre or specialised centre reports have shown promising mortality rates with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. However, the mortality rate of an entire country throughout the COVID-19 pandemic remains unknown.
Objectives: The primary objective is to determine the hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients receiving venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO) and venoarterial-ECMO (VA-ECMO) therapy. Secondary objectives are the chronological development of mortality during the pandemic, the analysis of comorbidities, age and complications.
Design: Cohort study.
Setting: Inpatient data from January 2020 to September 2021 of all hospitals in Germany were analysed.
Participants: All COVID-19-positive patients who received ECMO therapy were analysed according to the appropriate international statistical classification of diseases and related health problem codes (ICDs) and process key codes (OPSs).
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the hospital mortality.
Results: In total, 4279 COVID-19-positive patients who received ECMO therapy were analysed. Among 404 patients treated with VA-ECMO and 3875 treated with VV-ECMO, the hospital mortality was high: 72% (n=291) for VA-ECMO and 65.9% (n=2552) for VV-ECMO. A total of 43.2% (n=1848) of all patients were older than 60 years with a hospital mortality rate of 72.7% (n=172) for VA-ECMO and 77.6% (n=1301) for VV-ECMO. CPR was performed in 44.1% (n=178) of patients with VA-ECMO and 16.4% (n=637) of patients with VV-ECMO. The mortality rates widely varied from 48.1 to 84.4% in individual months and worsened from March 2020 (59.2%) to September 2021 (78.4%).
Conclusion: In Germany, a large proportion of elderly patients with COVID-19 were treated with ECMO, with an unacceptably high hospital mortality. Considering these data, the unconditional use of ECMO therapy in COVID-19 must be carefully considered and advanced age should be considered as a relative contraindication.
 
Back
Top Bottom