• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Estimating the prevalence of coinfection with influenza virus and the atypical bacteria Bordetella pertussis, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 May 1. [Epub ahead of print]
Estimating the prevalence of coinfection with influenza virus and the atypical bacteria Bordetella pertussis, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae.
Mina MJ1, Burke RM, Klugman KP.
Author information
Abstract

Coinfections with common bacterial respiratory pathogens and influenza viruses are well-known causes of disease, often via synergistic interactions between the influenza virus, the bacteria, and the human host. However, relatively little is known about interactions between atypical bacteria and influenza viruses. A recent report by Reinton et al. explored this issue by analyzing data from 3,661 patients seeking medical assistance for the presence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Bordetella pertussis, as well as influenza A or B virus in nasal swab specimens. The report, however, did not accurately assess the epidemiologic interactions of these pathogens. We aimed to describe the interactions between these bacterial species and influenza infections. Strong and highly statistically significant antagonistic interspecies interactions were detected between C. pneumoniae and influenza virus [odds ratio (OR): 0.09; p < 0.0001) and M. pneumoniae and influenza virus infections (OR: 0.29; p = 0.003). No association was detected between B. pertussis and influenza infection (p = 0.34), contrary to the initial report, and coinfection was not detected at a higher-than-by-chance frequency within the population. Further support of these results is supplied by the analysis of two earlier investigations reporting data on influenza virus and these atypical bacteria. Our results supplement the large body of literature regarding interactions between influenza virus and typical respiratory pathogens, providing a fuller picture of the spectrum of interactions between influenza viruses and respiratory bacteria. Further, we demonstrate the importance of choosing the most appropriate reference populations for the analysis being performed and describe the pitfalls that may occur when care is not taken in this regard.

PMID:
24789653
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24789653
 
Back
Top Bottom