• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Estimating the between-farm transmission rates for highly pathogenic avian influenza subtype H5N1 epidemics in Bangladesh between 2007 and 2013

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Aug 14. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12692. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Estimating the between-farm transmission rates for highly pathogenic avian influenza subtype H5N1 epidemics in Bangladesh between 2007 and 2013.[/h] Ssematimba A[SUP]1[/SUP], Okike I[SUP]2[/SUP], Ahmed GM[SUP]3[/SUP], Yamage M[SUP]3[/SUP], Boender GJ[SUP]4[/SUP], Hagenaars TJ[SUP]4[/SUP], Bett B[SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) is classified by the World Organization for Animal Health as one of the notifiable diseases. Its occurrence is associated with severe socio-economic impacts and is also zoonotic. Bangladesh HPAI epidemic data for the period between 2007 and 2013 were obtained and split into epidemic waves based on the time lag between outbreaks. By assuming the number of newly infected farms to be binomially distributed, we fit a Generalized Linear Model to the data to estimate between-farm transmission rates (β). These parameters are then used together with the calculated infectious periods to estimate the respective basic reproduction numbers (R[SUB]0[/SUB] ). The change in β and R[SUB]0[/SUB] with time during the course of each epidemic wave was explored. Finally, sensitivity analyses of the effects of reducing the delay in detecting infection on a farm as well as extended infectiousness of a farm beyond the day of culling were assessed. The point estimates obtained for β ranged from 0.08 (95% CI: 0.06-0.10) to 0.11 (95% CI: 0.08-0.20) per infectious farm per day while R[SUB]0[/SUB] ranged from 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-1.02) to 0.96 (95% CI: 0.72-1.20). Sensitivity analyses reveal that the estimates are quite robust to changes in the assumptions about the day in reporting infection and extended infectiousness. In the analysis allowing for time-varying transmission parameters, the rising and declining phases observed in the epidemic data were synchronized with the moments when R[SUB]0[/SUB] was greater and less than one, respectively. From an epidemiological perspective, the consistency of these estimates and their magnitude (R[SUB]0[/SUB] ≈ 1) indicate that the effectiveness of the deployed control measures was largely invariant between epidemic waves and the trend of the time-varying R[SUB]0[/SUB] supports the hypothesis of sustained farm-to-farm transmission that is possibly initiated by a few unique introductions.
? 2017 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] disease control; transmission; veterinary epidemiology; zoonosis/zoonotics

PMID: 28805017 DOI: 10.1111/tbed.12692
 
Back
Top Bottom