• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 infections: The effects of bacterial coinfect

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Numerous reports have described the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 infected patients. However, data on the effects of bacterial coinfection on these patients are very scarce.

Therefore, this study explores the impact of bacterial coinfection on the clinical and laboratory parameters amongst H1N1 hospitalized patients.FindingsThis retrospective study involved hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed H1N1 infections (September 2009 to May 2010). Relevant clinical data and the detection of bacterial coinfection from respiratory or sterile site samples were obtained.

Multiplex PCR was used to determine the co-existence of other respiratory viruses. Comparison was made between patients with and without bacterial coinfection.

The occurrence of coinfection was 34%; 14 (28%) bacterial and only 3 (6%) viral. Mycoplasma pneumoniae (n=5) was the commonest bacteria followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n=3).

In univariate analysis, clinical factors associated with bacterial coinfection were age >50 years (p=0.02), presence of comorbidity (p=0.04), liver impairment (p=0.02), development of complications (p=0.004) and supplemental oxygen requirement (p=0.02). Leukocytosis (p=0.02) and neutrophilia (p=0.004) were higher in bacterial coinfected patients.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age >50 years and combined complications were predictive of bacterial coinfection.

Conclusions: Bacterial coinfection is not uncommon in H1N1 infected patients and is more frequently noted in the older aged patients and is associated with higher rates of complications. Also, as adjunct to clinical findings, clinicians need to have a higher index of suspicion if neutrophilia was identified at admission as it may denote bacterial coinfection.

Author: Amreeta DhanoaNgim FangSharifah HassanPriyatharisni KaniappanGaneswrie Rajasekaram
Credits/Source: Virology Journal 2011, 8:501



Published on: 2011-11-03

http://7thspace.com/headlines/39878...ons_the_effects_of_bacterial_coinfection.html
 
Back
Top Bottom