• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Environ Sci Technol . Predictive Modeling of Virus Inactivation by UV

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Environ Sci Technol


. 2021 Feb 12.
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07814. Online ahead of print.
Predictive Modeling of Virus Inactivation by UV


Nicole C Rockey[SUP] 1 [/SUP], James B Henderson[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kaitlyn Chin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lutgarde Raskin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Krista R Wigginton[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

UV[SUB]254[/SUB] disinfection strategies are commonly applied to inactivate pathogenic viruses in water, food, air, and on surfaces. There is a need for methods that rapidly predict the kinetics of virus inactivation by UV[SUB]254[/SUB], particularly for emerging and difficult-to-culture viruses. We conducted a systematic literature review of inactivation rate constants for a wide range of viruses. Using these data and virus characteristics, we developed and evaluated linear and nonlinear models for predicting inactivation rate constants. Multiple linear regressions performed best for predicting the inactivation kinetics of (+) ssRNA and dsDNA viruses, with cross-validated root mean squared relative prediction errors similar to those associated with experimental rate constants. We tested the models by predicting and measuring inactivation rate constants of a (+) ssRNA mouse coronavirus and a dsDNA marine bacteriophage; the predicted rate constants were within 7% and 71% of the experimental rate constants, respectively, indicating that the prediction was more accurate for the (+) ssRNA virus than the dsDNA virus. Finally, we applied our models to predict the UV[SUB]254[/SUB] rate constants of several viruses for which high-quality UV[SUB]254[/SUB] inactivation data are not available. Our models will be valuable for predicting inactivation kinetics of emerging or difficult-to-culture viruses.
 
Back
Top Bottom