• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Enhanced vaccination effect against influenza by prebiotics in elderly patients receiving enteral nutrition

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jan 22. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12454. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Enhanced vaccination effect against influenza by prebiotics in elderly patients receiving enteral nutrition.[/h] Akatsu H[SUP]1[/SUP], Nagafuchi S, Kurihara R, Okuda K, Kanesaka T, Ogawa N, Kanematsu T, Takasugi S, Yamaji T, Takami M, Yamamoto T, Ohara H, Maruyama M.
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]AIM:[/h] We investigated the effect of prebiotics on the immunological response after influenza vaccination in enterally fed elderly individuals. The intervention group was given an enteral formula containing lactic acid bacteria-fermented milk products. In addition, two different types of other prebiotics, galacto-oligosaccharide and bifidogenic growth stimulator, were also given. The two prebiotics improved intestinal microbiota differently. In a control group, a standard formula without prebiotics was given.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] An enteral formula with (intervention group [F]) or without (control group [C]) prebiotics was given through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy to elderly participants for 10 weeks. Influenza vaccine was inoculated at week 4. Nutritional and biochemical indices, intestinal micro bacteria and immunological indices were analyzed.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] The Bifidobacterium count in groups F and C at week 0 was 6.4 ? 1.9 and 6.6 ? 3.0 (log10 [count/g feces]), respectively. Although the count in group C decreased at week 10, the count in group F increased. The Bacteroides count in group F increased from 10.7 ? 0.9 to 11.4 ? 0.5, but decreased in group C from 11.2 ? 0.2 to 10.7 ? 0.4. Although the enhanced titers of H1N1, H3N2 and B antigens against the vaccine decreased thereafter in group C, these enhanced titers in group F could be maintained.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Our findings suggest that prebiotics affect the intestinal microbiota and might maintain the antibody titers in elderly individuals. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015; ●●: ●●-●●.
? 2015 Japan Geriatrics Society.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] clinical immunology; influenza; nutrition; prebiotics; vaccination

PMID: 25613751 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom