• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Emerg Infect Dis . Comparative Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing Infections and Disease Progression from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 and

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Emerg Infect Dis

. 2023 Feb 3;29(3).
doi: 10.3201/eid2903.221367. Online ahead of print.
Comparative Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing Infections and Disease Progression from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 and BA.2, Portugal
Irina Kislaya, Pedro Casaca, Vítor Borges, Carlos Sousa, Bibiana I Ferreira, Ana Fonte, Eugénia Fernandes, Carlos Matias Dias, Sílvia Duarte, José Pedro Almeida, Inês Grenho, Luís Coelho, Rita Ferreira, Patrícia Pita Ferreira, Cláudia Medeiros Borges, Joana Isidro, Miguel Pinto, Luís Menezes, Daniel Sobral, Alexandra Nunes, Daniela Santos, António Maia Gonçalves, Luís Vieira, João Paulo Gomes, Pedro Pinto Leite, Baltazar Nunes, Ausenda Machado, André Peralta-Santos

PMID: 36737101 DOI: 10.3201/eid2903.221367

Abstract

We estimated comparative primary and booster vaccine effectiveness (VE) of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 and BA.2 lineages against infection and disease progression. During April-June 2022, we implemented a case-case and cohort study and classified lineages using whole-genome sequencing or spike gene target failure. For the case-case study, we estimated the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of vaccination using a logistic regression. For the cohort study, we estimated VE against disease progression using a penalized logistic regression. We observed no reduced VE for primary (aOR 1.07 [95% CI 0.93-1.23]) or booster (aOR 0.96 [95% CI 0.84-1.09]) vaccination against BA.5 infection. Among BA.5 case-patients, booster VE against progression to hospitalization was lower than that among BA.2 case-patients (VE 77% [95% CI 49%-90%] vs. VE 93% [95% CI 86%-97%]). Although booster vaccination is less effective against BA.5 than against BA.2, it offers substantial protection against progression from BA.5 infection to severe disease.

Keywords: BA.2; BA.5; COVID-19; Omicron; Portugal; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus disease; death; hospitalization; postinfection vaccine effectiveness; respiratory infections; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; vaccine-preventable diseases; viruses; zoonoses.
 
Back
Top Bottom