• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Efficiency of prognostic scores for the assessment of patients with severe influenza pneumonias

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Pneumologia. 2012 Jan-Mar;61(1):37-43.
[Efficiency of prognostic scores for the assessment of patients with severe influenza pneumonias].
[Article in Romanian]
Chesov D, Rusu D, Munteanu O, Brocovschii V, Botnaru V.
Source

Universitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie Nicolae Testemiţanu Clinica Medicală nr. 2. chesov.dumitru@gmail.com
Abstract
AIM:

To compare the efficiency of some prognostic scores in patients with severe influenza pneumonias.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:

The study was performed on a cohort of 75 cases of 2009 AH1N1 influenza associated pneumonias. Clinical and laboratory features at admission were used to calculate retrospectively the following prognostic scores: SCAP (Severe Community Acquired Pneumonia), CAP-PIRO (Community Acquired Pneumonia--Predisposition Infection Reaction, Organ failure), SMRT-CO (Systolic blood pressure, Multilobar infiltrates, Respiration rate, Tachycardia, Confusion, Oxygen), IDSA/ATS (Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society). The scores were used to assess two different outcomes--death and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The performance of the prognostic tools were assessed using the area under receiver operating characteristic (AUC), and the sensitivity and specificity for identifying high risk patients for severe course of pneumonia.
RESULTS:

IMV was applied in 29 (38.7%) of studied cases, in 15 (20%) the diseases had a fatal outcome. Despite the fact that all scores had a very good discriminatory power in predicting both outcomes (AUC > 0,8), some of them have a very low sensitivity, in classes corresponding to sever pneumonias, in predicting mortality (IDSA/ATS-0%; 95% CI, 0-21.8%), as well as the need for IMV (IDSA/ATS-0%; 95% CI, 0-11.9%); SCAP-58.6% (95% CI, 38.9-76.5%); CAP-PIRO-58,6% (95% CI, 38.9-76.5%).
CONCLUSIONS:

The CAP-PIRO and SMRT-CO scores were found to have the best performances to predict death from influenza associated severe pneumonias and the last, also in predicting the need for IVM. Other analyzed scores underestimate the risk of occurrence of both assessed outcomes.

PMID:
22545488
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22545488
 
Back
Top Bottom