tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2013 Sep 16. doi: 10.1111/irv.12163. [Epub ahead of print]
Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing medically attended influenza infection in England and Wales during the 2010/2011 season: a primary care-based cohort study.
Kafatos G, Pebody R, Andrews N, Durnall H, Barley M, Fleming D.
Source
Statistics Unit, Public Health England, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Estimates of seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) are affected by factors such as the strain of the current circulating influenza virus and characteristics of the host.
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this study was to provide VE estimates for the 2010/2011 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) in preventing medically attended influenza in England and Wales for the season 2010/2011.
METHODS:
A cohort study design was employed using electronic health records extracted from 104 GP practices in the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) primary care sentinel network. Endpoints included influenza-like illness (ILI), lower respiratory tract infection (LTRI) as well as PCR-confirmed influenza from patients swabbed from practices participating in a swabbing scheme. Adjustment was made for age, month, underlying chronic condition, region and number of consultations in the 12 months prior to the study period. In addition to the cohort analysis, a nested test-negative case-control analysis (TNCC) was carried out using the swab-negative results as controls.
RESULTS:
In the cohort analysis, VE against LRTI was -0?5% [95% CI: (-7?0%, 7?5%)], against ILI was 37?8% [95% CI: (32?3%, 43?0%)] and against PCR-confirmed influenza was 50?0% [95% CI
25?9%, 65?6%)] for type A and 44?4% [95% CI: (10?1%, 65?6%)] for type B. Using the TNCC design, the type A VE was 56?5% [95% CI: (30?4%, 72?7%)] and for type B was 54?0% [95% CI: (21?0%, 73?3%)].
CONCLUSIONS:
This study shows that the 2010/2011 TIV provided moderate protection against the circulating influenza strains for the 2010/2011 season. It also suggests that VE against the less specific diagnosis of ILI can be found, but less specific endpoints such as LRTI are not useful.
? 2013 Crown copyright.This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland.
KEYWORDS:
Cohort, influenza, trivalent influenza vaccine, vaccine effectiveness
PMID:
24103037
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24103037
Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing medically attended influenza infection in England and Wales during the 2010/2011 season: a primary care-based cohort study.
Kafatos G, Pebody R, Andrews N, Durnall H, Barley M, Fleming D.
Source
Statistics Unit, Public Health England, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Estimates of seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) are affected by factors such as the strain of the current circulating influenza virus and characteristics of the host.
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this study was to provide VE estimates for the 2010/2011 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) in preventing medically attended influenza in England and Wales for the season 2010/2011.
METHODS:
A cohort study design was employed using electronic health records extracted from 104 GP practices in the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) primary care sentinel network. Endpoints included influenza-like illness (ILI), lower respiratory tract infection (LTRI) as well as PCR-confirmed influenza from patients swabbed from practices participating in a swabbing scheme. Adjustment was made for age, month, underlying chronic condition, region and number of consultations in the 12 months prior to the study period. In addition to the cohort analysis, a nested test-negative case-control analysis (TNCC) was carried out using the swab-negative results as controls.
RESULTS:
In the cohort analysis, VE against LRTI was -0?5% [95% CI: (-7?0%, 7?5%)], against ILI was 37?8% [95% CI: (32?3%, 43?0%)] and against PCR-confirmed influenza was 50?0% [95% CI
25?9%, 65?6%)] for type A and 44?4% [95% CI: (10?1%, 65?6%)] for type B. Using the TNCC design, the type A VE was 56?5% [95% CI: (30?4%, 72?7%)] and for type B was 54?0% [95% CI: (21?0%, 73?3%)].CONCLUSIONS:
This study shows that the 2010/2011 TIV provided moderate protection against the circulating influenza strains for the 2010/2011 season. It also suggests that VE against the less specific diagnosis of ILI can be found, but less specific endpoints such as LRTI are not useful.
? 2013 Crown copyright.This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland.
KEYWORDS:
Cohort, influenza, trivalent influenza vaccine, vaccine effectiveness
PMID:
24103037
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24103037