• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccinations against laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated infections among Singapore military personnel in 20

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2014 May 14. doi: 10.1111/irv.12256. [Epub ahead of print]
Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccinations against laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated infections among Singapore military personnel in 2010-2013.
Ho HP1, Zhao X, Pang J, Chen MI, Lee VJ, Ang LW, Lin RV, Gao CQ, Hsu LY, Cook AR.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

Limited information is available about seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) in tropical communities.
OBJECTIVES:

Virus subtype-specific VE was determined for all military service personnel in the recruit camp and three other non-recruit camp in Singapore's Armed Forces from 1 June 2009 to 30 June 2012.
METHODS:

Consenting servicemen underwent nasal washes, which were tested with RT-PCR and subtyped. The test positive case and test negative control design was used to estimate the VE. To estimate the overall effect of the programme on new recruits, we used an ecological time series approach.
RESULTS:

A total of 7016 consultations were collected. The crude estimates for the VE of the triavalent vaccine against both influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and influenza B were 84% (95% CI 78-88%, 79-86%, respectively). Vaccine efficacy against influenza A(H3N2) was markedly lower (VE 33%, 95% CI -4% to 57%). An estimated 70% (RR = 0?30; 95% CI 0?11-0?84), 39% (RR = 0?61;0?25-1?43) and 75% (RR = 0?25; 95% CI 0?11-0?50) reduction in the risk of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B infections, respectively, in the recruit camp during the post-vaccination period compared with during the pre-vaccination period was observed.
CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, the blanket influenza vaccine programme in Singapore's Armed Forces has had a moderate to high degree of protection against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and influenza B, but not against influenza A(H3N2). Blanket influenza vaccination is recommended for all military personnel.

? 2014 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
KEYWORDS:

influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, influenza A(H3N2), influenza B, influenza vaccination, vaccine effectiveness

PMID:
24828687
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24828687
 
Back
Top Bottom