• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Effectiveness of MF59? Adjuvanted Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 Vaccine in Risk Groups in the Netherlands

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 30;8(4):e63156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063156. Print 2013.
Effectiveness of MF59? Adjuvanted Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 Vaccine in Risk Groups in the Netherlands.
Wijnans L, Dieleman J, Voordouw B, Sturkenboom M.
Source

Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands ; Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

The aim of the present study was to estimate the effectiveness of the MF59?-adjuvanted influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine against medically attended influenza-like illness and RT-PCR confirmed influenza in the at-risk population and persons over 60 in the Netherlands.
METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a Dutch based GP medical record database between 30 November 2009 and 1 March 2010 to estimate the vaccine effectiveness against influenza-like illness. Within the cohort we nested a test negative case-control study to estimate the effectiveness against laboratory confirmed influenza.
RESULTS:

The crude effectiveness in preventing diagnosed or possible influenza-like illness was 17.3% (95%CI: -8.5%-36.9%). Of the measured covariates, age, the severity of disease and health seeking behaviour through devised proxies confounded the association between vaccination and influenza-like illness. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness was 20.8% (95%CI: -5.4%, 40.5%) and varied significantly by age, being highest in adults up to 50 years (59%, 95%CI: 23%, 78%), and non-detectable in adults over 50 years. The number of cases in the nested case control study was too limited to validly estimate the VE against confirmed influenza.
CONCLUSIONS:

With our study we demonstrated that the approach of combining a cohort study in a primary health care database with field sampling is a feasible and useful option to monitor VE of influenza vaccines in the future.

PMID:
23646191
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23646191
 
Back
Top Bottom