• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccine against laboratory-confirmed influenza pneumonia among adults aged ≥65 years in Japan

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2018 Apr 20. pii: S0264-410X(18)30520-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.037. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccine against laboratory-confirmed influenza pneumonia among adults aged ≥65 years in Japan.[/h] Suzuki M[SUP]1[/SUP], Katsurada N[SUP]2[/SUP], Le MN[SUP]3[/SUP], Kaneko N[SUP]4[/SUP], Yaegashi M[SUP]5[/SUP], Hosokawa N[SUP]6[/SUP], Otsuka Y[SUP]7[/SUP], Aoshima M[SUP]4[/SUP], Yoshida LM[SUP]8[/SUP], Morimoto K[SUP]9[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] The effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) against laboratory-confirmed influenza pneumonia in older adults remains to be established.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Pneumonia patients aged ≥65 years who visited a study hospital in Chiba, Japan, were prospectively enrolled from February 2012 to January 2014. Sputum samples were collected from participants and tested for influenza virus by polymerase chain reaction assays. Influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza pneumonia was estimated by a test-negative design.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Among a total of 814 pneumonia patients, 42 (5.2%) tested positive for influenza: 40 were positive for influenza A virus, and two were positive for influenza B virus. The IVE against laboratory-confirmed influenza pneumonia was 58.3% (95% confidence interval, 28.8-75.6%). The IVE against influenza pneumonia hospital admission, severe pneumonia, and death was 60.2% (95% CI, 22.8-79.4%), 65.5% (95% CI, 44.3-78.7%), and 71% (95% CI, -62.9% to 94.8%), respectively. In the subgroup analyses, the IVE against influenza pneumonia was higher for patients with immunosuppressive conditions (85.9%; 95% CI, 67.4-93.9%) than for those without (48.7%; 95% CI, 2.7-73%) but did not differ by patients' statin use status.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] IIV effectively reduces the risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza pneumonia in older adults.
Copyright ? 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Inactivated influenza vaccine; Influenza pneumonia; Test-negative case-control design; Vaccine effectiveness

PMID: 29685596 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.037
 
Back
Top Bottom