• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Economic Appraisal of Ontario's Universal Influenza Immunization Program: A Cost-Utility Analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
OTTAWA ? When Ontario started offering free flu shots to its entire population instead of only to targeted groups, it made a cost-effective decision that saves lives, a new study concludes.

Researchers at the University of Toronto conducted an extensive cost-analysis of the universal seasonal flu vaccination program, introduced in 2000, and compared the numbers to the cost and success of the targeted program, had it been continued.

"The main conclusion is that it is cost-effective," said the study's lead researcher, Beate Sander. "It doesn't mean it's necessarily cost-saving, but it provides very good value for money," she said of the universal program.

Most provinces and territories offer free seasonal flu vaccinations to senior citizens, people with chronic conditions that put them at higher-risk of suffering serious complications if they contract influenza and to health-care workers. Ontario is the only jurisdiction to offer free flu shots to everyone, at about twice the cost of offering only a targeted program, and this is the first major study to evaluate whether it's worth the price tag.

Sander said the $40 million spent on the universal seasonal flu shot campaign is "very, very good value for money."

The widespread flu shot campaign drove up vaccination rates in Ontario from only 18 per cent of the population in 1996 to 42 per cent in 2005. Analyzing data on influenza-related deaths, hospitalizations, and visits to emergency rooms and doctors' offices between 1997 and 2004, the study found that flu-related events in the overall population dropped 40 to 60 per cent more in Ontario than in three other provinces studied (Alberta, Quebec and Manitoba).

Specifically, the researchers determined that more than 34,000 flu cases were prevented, 111 deaths were avoided, about 780 hospitalizations and 7,745 emergency room visits were prevented and about 30,000 fewer Ontarians visited a doctor for flu symptoms.

Sander said it's possible something else happened to drive down the numbers over the years studied, but that the study controlled for many factors and she believes the universal vaccination program had a "true effect" on the reduced rates of illness and death.

Preventing thousands of people from getting sick and needing health care translated into savings of $7.8 million per year for Ontario's health system, the researchers calculated.

While that doesn't fully offset the cost of the program, it still makes economic sense when a measure known as quality-adjusted life years (QALY) is taken into account, according to Sander. It's a method of quantifying the quality of a year of life, on a scale of zero to one. A year in perfect health would score a one whereas someone sick in bed for months may have a QALY equal to 0.5.

The review, published Tuesday in the journal PLoS Medicine, found that the cost to generate one year of perfect health through universal influenza vaccination was $10,797. In Canada, an initiative is considered cost-effective for the health system if it costs less than $50,000 to gain one QALY.

With so much attention paid to influenza vaccines recently because of the H1N1 pandemic, the study's findings should be of interest to provincial governments that may be considering revamping their vaccine delivery programs.

There was heightened demand for seasonal flu shots among the general population last year as many people rolled up their sleeves for one at the same time as getting their H1N1 vaccination.

Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/heal...ective+Study/2770113/story.html#ixzz0kOmX2uTP

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000256
 
Re: Universal flu vaccine program cost-effective: Study

Re: Universal flu vaccine program cost-effective: Study

ahh, what a headline.
Universal flu vaccines are usually understood to be
those which work for all the flu-strains independent of serotype.

see e.g. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080124185522.htm


will "you" at Flutrackers.com continue to publish these misleading headlines or will you develope
a poilicy to correct them ?
 
Re: Economic Appraisal of Ontario's Universal Influenza Immunization Program: A Cost-Utility Analysis

I edited the headline with the original title, it is not so different...
 
Re: Economic Appraisal of Ontario's Universal Influenza Immunization Program: A Cost-Utility Analysis

we can change the headlines, make our own ones.
That clarifies things and also evades possible copyrights.

I think often the headlines are added by people who just want
to attract attention, and not by the authors of the articles

I'm also for posting summaries instead of full articles
for the same reasons and also they are quicker to read


my suggested headline here would be:

free flu-shot strategy since 2000 was cost effective in Ontario,Canada
 
Re: Economic Appraisal of Ontario's Universal Influenza Immunization Program: A Cost-Utility Analysis

Everyone has his own policies, doesn' t you think ?
My policy may be different from yours.
I believe it is correct to report the source with the original title
But you are free to criticize that title and to write a comment , if you disagree with it.
 
Re: Economic Appraisal of Ontario's Universal Influenza Immunization Program: A Cost-Utility Analysis

but are you usually content with the original titles ?
I'm not. So many examples ...

Those who want the original articles can just find and read them
through a news-site with keyword-search.

I think one idea of these forums is to select and present them
in a better way.
And encourage discussion about them, of course.


There had also been the recent copyright discussion.
e.g. at TBM we are no longer allowed to post whole articles.
Summaries and own headlines should avoid this too.
 
Re: Universal flu vaccine program cost-effective: Study

Re: Universal flu vaccine program cost-effective: Study

ahh, what a headline.
Universal flu vaccines are usually understood to be
those which work for all the flu-strains independent of serotype.

see e.g. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080124185522.htm


will "you" at Flutrackers.com continue to publish these misleading headlines or will you develope
a poilicy to correct them ?

Each poster selects the actual title for the site. Sometimes it is the exact title. Sometimes it is not. We encourage individual initiative here. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom