I was brainstorming about the implications of Ebola now spreading in more urban environments. (other than sheer population density). One thing I am curious about is the increased possibility that the reproductive ratio of the virus could be influenced by men who have survived Ebola. There is the possibility that they can pass it to their partners as an STD. It has been shown that the virus has the potential to be passed on sexually after a man has survived a case of Ebola.
Given that the death rate of this strain is significantly lower than other occurrences, and given that young adults in an urban environments tend to have a more robust night life than rural ones - I am wondering if this could now be a serious issue whereas in the past, it probably wasn't.
One of the problems I see is that this circumvents the tendency of the virus to "burn out" due to the higher survival rate (relatively) and the ability to pass on the virus for a much longer period of time (3+ months) than a symptomatic person (about 10 days max). Not to mention that a person who has survived Ebola has no visual indicators.
While you would think that someone who survived Ebola would not knowingly pass it on, I am betting there are many who just don't know they can pass it on. Some who survive Ebola might not even know they had Ebola. There are strong indications that there are many people surviving Ebola outside of the supervision of medical institutions.
This might hurt contact tracing and containment as well. It will be a pain if an area is cleared only to have a transmission occur months later.
I wonder if there are metrics that could be warning signs that this is happening - perhaps in the gender ratios of those getting Ebola.
I had a hard time finding studies on this. Would really appreciate it if anyone has some links to some.
Given that the death rate of this strain is significantly lower than other occurrences, and given that young adults in an urban environments tend to have a more robust night life than rural ones - I am wondering if this could now be a serious issue whereas in the past, it probably wasn't.
One of the problems I see is that this circumvents the tendency of the virus to "burn out" due to the higher survival rate (relatively) and the ability to pass on the virus for a much longer period of time (3+ months) than a symptomatic person (about 10 days max). Not to mention that a person who has survived Ebola has no visual indicators.
While you would think that someone who survived Ebola would not knowingly pass it on, I am betting there are many who just don't know they can pass it on. Some who survive Ebola might not even know they had Ebola. There are strong indications that there are many people surviving Ebola outside of the supervision of medical institutions.
This might hurt contact tracing and containment as well. It will be a pain if an area is cleared only to have a transmission occur months later.
I wonder if there are metrics that could be warning signs that this is happening - perhaps in the gender ratios of those getting Ebola.
I had a hard time finding studies on this. Would really appreciate it if anyone has some links to some.