• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Dose Response . Effectiveness of Convalescent Plasma Therapy for COVID-19 Patients in Hunan, China

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Dose Response


. 2020 Dec 15;18(4):1559325820979921.
doi: 10.1177/1559325820979921. eCollection Oct-Dec 2020.
Effectiveness of Convalescent Plasma Therapy for COVID-19 Patients in Hunan, China


Xingsheng Hu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chunhong Hu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dixuan Jiang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Qian Zuo[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ya Li[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Yang Wang[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Xiangyu Chen[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: To investigate clinical efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma (CP) therapy in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.
Methods: We included 4 severe patients and 3 critical patients. The date of admission to hospital ranged from January 30 to February 19, 2020. We retrospectively collected clinical and outcome data. Relative parameters were compared.
Results: After CP therapy, the symptoms and respiratory functions were improved. Median PaO[SUB]2[/SUB]/FIO[SUB]2[/SUB] increased from 254 (142-331) to 326 (163-364), and dependence of oxygen supply decreased. Median time to lesion's first absorption was 5 (2-7) days, undetectable viral RNA was 11 (3.5-15.7) days. Median lymphocyte count (0.77 ? 10[SUP]9[/SUP]/L vs 0.85 ? 10[SUP]9[/SUP]/L) and albumin level (31g/L vs 36 g/L) were elevated, C-reactive protein (44 mg/L vs 18 mg/L), D-dimer (5.9 mg/L vs 4 mg/L) and lactate dehydrogenase (263 U/L vs 245 U/L) decreased. No obvious adverse reactions were observed. At the follow-up on June 14, 2020, 6 patients had completely recovered and one died from terminal disease.
Conclusion: CP therapy for COVID-19 was effective and safe. Three patients who did not combine with antiviral therapy after CP also obtained viral clearance and clinical improvement. However, CP therapy failed to save the life of a terminally ill patient.

Keywords: COVID-19; PaO2/FIO2; SARS-CoV-2; clinical outcomes; convalescent plasma.
 
Back
Top Bottom