• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Disaster Med Public Health Prep . Feasibility, Acceptability, and Barriers to Implementing Select Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions to Reduce the Tra

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Disaster Med Public Health Prep


. 2022 Aug 1;1-22.
doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.174. Online ahead of print.
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Barriers to Implementing Select Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions to Reduce the Transmission of Pandemic Influenza - United States, 2019


Faruque Ahmed[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Noreen Qualls[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shelly Kowalczyk[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Suzanne Randolph Cunningham[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Nicole Zviedrite[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Amra Uzicanin[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives: To assess feasibility and acceptability of implementing non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) reserved for influenza pandemics (voluntary home quarantine; use of face masks by ill persons; childcare facility closures; school closures; and social distancing at schools, workplaces, and mass gatherings).
Methods: Public health officials in all 50 states, Washington, DC, and 8 territories, and a random sample of 822 local health departments (LHDs) were surveyed in 2019.
Results: The response rates for the states/territories and LHDs were 75% (44/59) and 25% (206/822), respectively. The majority of the state/territorial respondents stated that the feasibility and acceptability of implementing NPIs were high, except for K-12 school closures lasting up to 6 weeks or 6 months. The LHD respondents also indicated that feasibility and acceptability were lowest for prolonged school closures. Compared to LHD respondents in suburban or urban areas, those in rural areas expressed lower feasibility and acceptability. Barriers to implementing NPIs included financial impact, compliance and difficulty in enforcement, perceived level of disease threat, and concerns regarding political implications.
Conclusions: Proactive strategies to systematically address perceived barriers and promote disease prevention ahead of a new pandemic are needed to increase receptivity and consistent adoption of NPIs and other evidence-based countermeasures.

Keywords: COVID-19; influenza; non-pharmaceutical interventions; pandemic; social distancing.
 
Back
Top Bottom